Dear fellow shareholders and employees,
On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your investment in Spire. It is our privilege to serve you, and we appreciate the responsibility and trust you place in us to help grow and guide our Company for continued success in the future. This past fiscal year has once again been one of challenges and change. As a Board, we have remained focused on our oversight responsibilities, with an emphasis on identification and mitigation of material risks and the development and implementation of company strategy, succession plans for the Board and senior management, and environmental, social and governance strategies and disclosures.
Each year presents new challenges to the energy industry, and the Board remains focused on short-term and long-term strategy and results, sustainable shareholder value, risk identification and mitigation, and the Company’s preparedness to grow and succeed. We believe that overseeing these aspects of Spire are at the core of our duties as directors.
The Board is continuously focused on seeking to ensure that we have the mix of diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences required to meet evolving challenges. We are committed to ensuring that our Board is made up of directors who are independent, committed, capable, diverse, experienced and accountable to our shareholders.
A strong and sustainable management team is one of the keys to Spire’s success. Throughout the year, the compensation and human resources committee focuses on senior management succession planning. The committee periodically participates in in-depth conversations with our president and chief executive officer and our management team during which potential future senior leaders are identified and development plans are discussed.
Spire is committed to interacting with investors to determine what information is important to them, enhancing disclosures and making environmental, social and governance information even more accessible. We are also, once again this year, highlighting our response to COVID-19 and how we are working to keep our employees, customers and communities safe while providing reliable natural gas service. You will also notice several additional enhanced disclosures within the pages of this proxy statement as we strive to share Spire’s story more effectively each year.
Once again, on behalf of our Board of Directors, thank you for your investment in Spire and for your continued support.
January 27, 2022
8:30 a.m., Central Standard Time (CST)
This year’s meeting is a virtual shareholders meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SR2021
Proxy voting
Your vote is important. To ensure your representation at the annual meeting, please vote your shares as promptly as possible over the internet at www.proxyvote.com or by telephone at 800-690-6903. Alternatively, you may request a paper proxy card, which you may complete, sign and return by mail. If your shares are held by a broker, bank or nominee, please follow their voting instructions for your vote to count.
Attending the meeting
We invite you to attend the annual meeting virtually. There will not be a physical meeting. You will be able to vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the meeting. You will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials.
You do not need to attend the meeting online to vote if you submit your vote via proxy in advance of the meeting. A replay of the meeting will be available on virtualshareholdermeeting.com.
The annual meeting of shareholders of Spire Inc. (“Spire” or the “Company”) will be held on Thursday, January 27, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. CST, online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SR2021, for the following purposes:
1. | To elect four members of the Board of Directors. |
2. | To provide an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. |
3. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accountant for the 2022 fiscal year. |
4. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement. |
Proxy statement summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
At Spire, we believe energy exists to help people. To warm homes, grow businesses and move communities forward. Every day, we have the privilege of serving 1.7 million homes and businesses, as well as natural gas buyers, producers and industrial customers through our gas-related businesses.
As the fifth-largest publicly traded natural gas company in the country, we are committed to growing our business, leading our industry and redefining what it means to serve our customers. This commitment is reflected in our mission to answer every challenge, advance every community and enrich every life through the strength of our energy. To live this mission, we hold strongly to our three values:
Safety | Inclusion | Integrity | ||||
Whether at a desk or in the field, safety is fundamental at Spire. We strive for exceptional safety, going beyond regulatory standards to achieve our own standard of excellence. Our promise is that we will work tirelessly to keep our co-workers, customers and communities safe. | We celebrate differences, embracing diverse backgrounds, perspectives and families, and we look for common ground with an inclusive spirit. We treat everyone with respect and care, and we champion new insights and ideas. | We believe in doing what’s right, every time. Keeping that promise is not always easy but, because it’s our way of life, we don’t stop until we get it right. |
As the pandemic continued throughout fiscal 2021, we continued to prioritize the health and safety of our employees, customers and communities. Our cross-functional incident support team led the Company through the changing landscape of the pandemic and implemented a range of measures, including:
• | Following strict safety protocols for all entry into customer premises to ensure that we could continue to provide service safely to all customers |
• | Allowing employees to work from home if their job duties could be performed remotely |
• | Restricting non-essential travel and participation in large events and gatherings |
• | Developing gradual return-to-work plans for our workforce that has been working remotely |
• | Following recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to evolve our safety protocols over the course of the pandemic |
• | Providing paid leave to employees who needed to quarantine or take care of a family member due to COVID-19 |
• | Encouraging employees to be vaccinated and facilitating employee vaccinations with paid time off and other incentives |
The Board has maintained oversight over Spire’s continued response to the pandemic through regular reporting from management.
Consistent with fiscal 2020, we did not furlough or lay off any employees in fiscal 2021. In addition, management did not recommend, nor did the Board approve, any changes to our executive compensation metrics or program in connection with the pandemic. See the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section herein for more information.
The following table provides information on the Company’s performance in the last two fiscal years, which was a critical consideration in the Company’s determination of appropriate executive compensation. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, the Company reported consolidated net income of $271.7 million ($4.96 per diluted share), compared with $88.6 million ($1.44 per diluted share) in fiscal 2020. The prior year amount reflects the impact of the third quarter 2020 impairment charge of $148.6 million ($117.3 million after tax). Excluding this charge, net income increased $65.8 million, driven by increases of $37.8 million and $23.6 million in the Gas Marketing and Gas Utility segments, respectively, combined with a $4.4 million improvement in results from Other. The Gas Marketing and Gas Utility results reflect the positive effects of optimizing market conditions in February due to extreme weather as a result of Winter Storm Uri. Net income and earnings per share are determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
Management also uses the non-GAAP measures of net economic earnings (“NEE”) and NEE per share when internally evaluating and reporting results of operations, as discussed on pages 32-33 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2021 (the “2021 10-K”). NEE for fiscal 2021 was $266.3 million ($4.86 per diluted share), up from $207.8 million ($3.76 per diluted share) for fiscal 2020. The $58.5 million growth includes a $37.9 million increase for Gas Marketing and a $17.2 million increase in the Gas Utility segment, as well as improvements in Other. The results are discussed further beginning on page 34 of the 2021 10-K.
In millions, except per share amounts | Gas Utility | Gas Marketing | Other | Consolidated | Per diluted share** | |||||||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) [GAAP] | $ | 237.2 | $ | 44.8 | $ | (10.3 | ) | $ | 271.7 | $ | 4.96 | |||||||||
Adjustments, pre-tax: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Missouri regulatory adjustments | (9.0 | ) | — | — | (9.0 | ) | (0.17 | ) | ||||||||||||
Fair value and timing adjustments | 0.3 | 3.0 | — | 3.3 | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, divestiture and restructuring activities | — | — | (1.3 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax effect of adjustments* | 2.1 | (0.8 | ) | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||
Net economic earnings (loss) [non-GAAP] | $ | 230.6 | $ | 47.0 | $ | (11.3 | ) | $ | 266.3 | $ | 4.86 | |||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) [GAAP] | $ | 213.6 | $ | 7.0 | $ | (132.0 | ) | $ | 88.6 | $ | 1.44 | |||||||||
Adjustments, pre-tax: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairments | — | — | 148.6 | 148.6 | 2.89 | |||||||||||||||
Fair value and timing adjustments | (0.3 | ) | 2.8 | — | 2.5 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax effect of adjustments* | 0.1 | (0.7 | ) | (31.3 | ) | (31.9 | ) | (0.62 | ) | |||||||||||
Net economic earnings (loss) [non-GAAP] | $ | 213.4 | $ | 9.1 | $ | (14.7 | ) | $ | 207.8 | $ | 3.76 |
* | Income tax effect is calculated by applying federal, state and local income tax rates applicable to ordinary income to the amounts of the pre-tax reconciling items and then adding any estimated effects of enacted state or local income tax laws for periods before the related effective date. |
** | Net economic earnings per share is calculated by replacing consolidated net income with consolidated net economic earnings in the GAAP diluted earnings per share calculation, which includes reductions for cumulative preferred dividends and participating shares. |
Net Income | Net Economic Earnings | Diluted Earnings per Share |
Basic Net Economic Earnings per Share |
Diluted NEE per Share |
Dividends Declared per Common Share | |||||||
$271.7M | $266.3M | $4.96 | $4.87 | $4.86 | $2.60 | |||||||
GAAP Up from |
NON-GAAP Up from |
GAAP Up from |
NON-GAAP Up from |
NON-GAAP Up from |
Up from $2.49 for FY20 |
The Company is committed to its pay-for-performance philosophy. Basic net economic earnings per share is the key metric used to determine funding under our Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) in 2021. The Company also emphasizes pay-for-performance by placing most of the executives’ target total direct compensation (“TTDC”) at risk through the annual and long-term incentive plans. TTDC includes the current base salary, the 2021 target AIP opportunity and the market value of the equity awards made during fiscal year 2021. Further, the value of the equity incentive award, the largest portion of incentive pay, is based on long-term performance.
Sustainability
We have issued our annual Corporate Social Responsibility report in May during the past three years. We plan to issue our next report in May 2022. We remain committed to enhancing and expanding our disclosures each year to more fully describe the work we are doing to make Spire more sustainable. We are working toward Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) reporting in calendar year 2022, and we are currently evaluating the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework.
In fiscal 2021, the various committees of the Board of Directors assumed formal oversight of management’s sustainability efforts in the areas of environmental; diversity, equity and inclusion; supplier diversity; and governance. The corporate governance committee remains responsible for overseeing and approving the report, which we plan to rename to be our Sustainability report. The current Corporate Social Responsibility report can be found on our website at SpireEnergy.com/CSR.
Annual meeting of shareholders
Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |||
By internet | By telephone | By mail | At the meeting | |||
www.proxyvote.com | 800-690-6903 | Mark your proxy card or voting instruction card, date and sign it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided. |
If you decide to attend the virtual meeting, you will need your 16-digit control number and follow the instructions on the screen. |
Voting matters
Proposal | Board vote recommendation | Page reference (for more detail) | ||||
Election of four directors | ![]() | FOR | 9 | |||
Provide advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers | ![]() | FOR | 29 | |||
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022 | ![]() | FOR | 59 |
Nominees for election (page 9)
The following chart includes summary bios and key aspects of our Board of Directors, including directors who are nominees this year. We believe the competencies currently possessed by our directors represent a solid mix of backgrounds and experiences for the Company.
|
The following chart includes summary bios and key aspects of our Board of Directors, including directors who are nominees this year. We believe the competencies currently possessed by our directors represent a solid mix of backgrounds and experiences for the Company.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Mark A. Borer Retired Chief Executive
Age: 67 Director since: 2014 Committees: |
Maria V. Fogarty Retired Senior
Age: 62 Director since: 2014 Committees: |
Edward L. Glotzbach Retired Vice Chairman,
Age: 73 Director since: 2005 Committees: |
Carrie J. Hightman Nominee
Retired Executive
Age: 64 Director since: 2021 Committees: TBD | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
Rob L. Jones Retired Co-Head
Age: 63 Director since: 2016 Committees: |
Brenda D. Newberry
Nominee
Retired Chairman
Age: 68 Director since: 2007 Committees: |
Stephen S. Schwartz President and Chief Executive Officer
Age: 62 Director since: 2018 Committees: |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
Suzanne Sitherwood
Nominee
President and Chief Executive Officer
Age: 61 Director since: 2011 Committees: |
John P. Stupp Jr. Chairman, President
Age: 71 Director since: 2005 Committees: |
Mary Ann Van Lokeren
Nominee
Retired Chairman and
Age: 74 Director since: 2000 Committees: |
Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (page 29)
As we do every year, we are again seeking shareholder advisory approval of the Company’s compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Although the vote on this proposal is advisory and nonbinding, the compensation and human resources committee and Board will review the results of the vote and consider the collective views of our shareholders in future determinations concerning our executive compensation program.
Independent registered public accountant (page 59)
We are asking shareholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte as our independent registered public accountant for fiscal year 2022. The table contains summary information with respect to Deloitte’s fees for services provided in fiscal years 2021 and 2020.
Proposal 1: Election of directors
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes. Directors Hightman, Newberry, Sitherwood and Van Lokeren, whose terms will expire upon the election of directors at the meeting on January 27, 2022, have been nominated to stand for reelection. Directors Hightman, Newberry and Sitherwood are nominated for terms expiring upon the election of their successors in January 2025 or their earlier removal or resignation from office. Director Van Lokeren is nominated for a term expiring in January 2023 at which time she will retire due to Spire’s mandatory director retirement rules. The persons named as proxies intend to vote FOR the election of the four nominees.
Information about the nominees and directors
Mary Ann Van Lokeren | ||
Age: 74
Director since: 2000
Independent
Committees: |
Ms. Van Lokeren retired as chairman and chief executive officer of Krey Distributing Co., an Anheuser-Busch wholesaler, in October 2006. She had served in that capacity since December 1986. Skills relevant to Spire: With her prior experience as CEO of one of the largest Anheuser-Busch wholesalers in Missouri, Ms. Van Lokeren has business and leadership expertise that assists the Board as it evaluates the Company’s financial and operational risks, controls and strategy. Her prior experience on other public company boards provides insight as to the Board’s role in oversight of management as well as corporate governance. Other public directorships: Retired from the board of Masco Corporation in May 2018. |
Carrie J. Hightman | ||
Age: 64
Director since: 2021
Independent
Committees: TBD |
Ms. Hightman retired in January 2021 after having served as executive vice president and chief legal officer of NiSource Inc., which is a $9B market cap, $5B revenue gas and electric utility holding company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. She also served as president and chief executive officer of Columbia Gas of Massachusetts, the commonwealth’s largest natural gas utility, until its sale by NiSource in October 2020. Prior to joining NiSource in 2007, Ms. Hightman served as president of AT&T Illinois and led the Energy, Telecommunications and Public Utilities practice group at Schiff Hardin LLP, a national law firm. Skills relevant to Spire: Ms. Hightman’s broad range of experience during her more than three-decades-long business career, including gas operations, regulatory strategy, federal government affairs, ethics, corporate communications, environmental, safety, data privacy and human resources, adds depth and breadth to the Board. Her specific focus on regulated industries, crisis management and ESG and her experience as a lawyer add a new dimension and fresh perspectives to the Board. Other public directorships: None |
Brenda D. Newberry | ||
Age: 68
Director since: 2007
Independent
Committees: |
Ms. Newberry retired in May 2010 as chairman of the board of The Newberry Group, a provider of information technology consulting services on a global basis, specializing in information systems, technology infrastructure, data and network security, and project management services. Ms. Newberry founded The Newberry Group in 1996. Skills relevant to Spire: Ms. Newberry provides insight into the Company’s information technology strategy and related risks and exposures. Her experience in creating and building her own businesses assists the Company as it considers growth opportunities, and her government contractor experience provides insight into conducting business in a highly regulated industry. Other public directorships: None |
Suzanne Sitherwood | ||
Age: 61
Director since: 2011
Management
Committees: |
Ms. Sitherwood has served as the Company’s president since September 1, 2011 and chief executive officer since February 1, 2012. Skills relevant to Spire: Ms. Sitherwood has more than 40 years of experience in the natural gas industry and has overseen significant growth at the Company. During the course of her career, Ms. Sitherwood has gained extensive management and operational experience and has demonstrated a strong track record of leadership, strategic vision and business acumen. In her capacity as CEO and member of the Board, she is utilizing her knowledge of the energy markets in overseeing the development of the Company’s long-term strategy. Other public directorships: Ms. Sitherwood has been a director at Alcoa Corporation (“Alcoa”) since 2016, where she serves on the audit committee and the compensation and benefits committee. Ms. Sitherwood has notified Alcoa that she does not intend to stand for re-election to the Alcoa board of directors at Alcoa’s 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.
Other directorships: Ms. Sitherwood has been a director at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis since 2016, where she serves as chair of the board. |
Edward L. Glotzbach | ||
Age: 73
Director since: 2005
Independent
Committees: |
Mr. Glotzbach served as vice chairman, mergers and acquisitions, of Information Services Group from November 2007, when it acquired Technology Partners International, Inc., until his retirement in March 2012. From December 2004 to November 2007, he served as president and chief executive officer of Technology Partners International, Inc., an organization that assists clients with the evaluation, negotiation, implementation and management of information technology and business process sourcing initiatives. From October 2003 to December 2004, he served as vice president and chief financial officer of the firm. From 1970 to September 2003, he served in many positions with SBC Communications, with his most recent position there being executive vice president and chief information officer for six years. Skills relevant to Spire: Mr. Glotzbach brings to the Board business and leadership experience as an executive of a public company, regulated utility experience as a former executive of a telephone utility regulated by the Missouri Public Service Commission, financial expertise having served as a chief financial officer at other companies, and information technology expertise given his experience at Information Services Group and his chief information officer experience at a major telephone company. He also provides insight to the Company as to potential exposures and risks in those areas. Other public directorships: None |
Rob L. Jones | ||
Age: 63
Director since: 2016
Independent
Committees: |
Mr. Jones served as co-head of Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (MLC) from 2007 until his retirement in March 2012. MLC is a global commodities trading business and a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America. Prior to taking leadership of MLC, he served as head of Merrill Lynch’s Global Energy and Power Investment Banking Group. An investment banker with Merrill Lynch and The First Boston Corporation for over 20 years, Mr. Jones worked extensively with a variety of energy and power clients, with a particular focus on the natural gas and utility sectors. Mr. Jones has also served as an Executive in Residence at the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin with a focus on energy finance. Skills relevant to Spire: Mr. Jones’ experience in financial roles in the energy banking industry, with a particular focus on the natural gas and utility sectors, as well as his experience as a lead independent director of a publicly traded partnership, add a unique dimension to the Board and provide insight into the capital markets and financial risks and strategies. Other public directorships: Since 2014, he has served on the board of directors of Shell Midstream Partners GP LLC, which is the general partner of Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. He also chairs its audit committee and serves on its conflicts committee. |
John P. Stupp Jr. | ||
Age: 71
Director since: 2005
Independent
Committees: |
Mr. Stupp has been president of Stupp Bros., Inc. since March 2004 and chairman and chief executive officer since March 2014 and chief executive officer of Stupp Corporation since August 1995. Through its subsidiaries, Stupp Bros., Inc. fabricates steel highway and railroad bridges, produces pipe for natural gas and oil transmission pipelines, and offers general, steel and industrial construction services. Mr. Stupp serves as a director of Stupp Bros., Inc. Skills relevant to Spire: As chairman, CEO and president of Stupp Bros., Inc., one of the Company’s largest shareholders with a long-term investment relationship with the Company, Mr. Stupp has historic institutional knowledge of the Company and directly represents shareholder interests. Further, his experience with the various subsidiaries and investments of Stupp Bros., Inc. provides insight as to the pipeline and other infrastructure industries on a national basis as well as insight into the regional economy. Other public directorships: Mr. Stupp joined the Atrion Corp. board in 1985, where he serves on the compensation committee and chairs the audit committee. |
Mark A. Borer | ||
Age: 67
Director since: 2014
Independent
Committees: |
Mr. Borer served as chief executive officer as well as a member of the board of directors of DCP Midstream Partners LP from November 2006 through his retirement in December 2012. DCP Midstream Partners LP is a public midstream master limited partnership that is engaged in all stages of the midstream business for both natural gas and natural gas liquids. Skills relevant to Spire: Mr. Borer’s experience in the midstream natural gas business gives him hands-on knowledge of the industry. His service as a CEO and member of the board of a public entity that grew significantly under his leadership provides him with experience in the operations of an energy company and the capital markets, and he possesses business and leadership expertise that assists the Board as it evaluates the Company’s financial and operational risks and strategy. Other public directorships: Since 2017, Mr. Borer has served on the board of Altus Midstream Company, where he serves on the audit committee and conflicts committee. |
Maria V. Fogarty | ||
Age: 62
Director since: 2014
Independent
Committees: |
Ms. Fogarty served as the senior vice president of internal audit and compliance at NextEra Energy, Inc. from 2011 through her retirement in June 2014. She previously served as vice president of internal audit at that company from 2005 to 2010 and director of internal audit from April 1993 through 2004. NextEra Energy, Inc. is a leading clean energy company and the parent company of Florida Power & Light, the largest rate-regulated electric utility in Florida. Skills relevant to Spire: Ms. Fogarty’s prior experience leading the audit function at a public energy company provides her knowledge of the audit and Sarbanes-Oxley requirements facing public companies today. Her industry experience at a company that grew significantly during her tenure benefits the Board, as she can provide insights into the risks, opportunities and challenges created by growth. Other public directorships: None |
Stephen S. Schwartz | ||
Age: 62
Director since: 2018
Independent
Committees: |
Dr. Schwartz joined Brooks Automation, Inc. in April 2010 as president and continued to serve in that role until August 2013. He was re-appointed president in May 2016. On October 1, 2010, he became chief executive officer and continues to serve in that role. Skills relevant to Spire: Dr. Schwartz has extensive leadership, operational, strategic and financial management and reporting experience as chief executive officer of a successful public company and brings to the Board a unique perspective with regard to innovation and technology based on his experience in the automation manufacturing space. Other public directorships: Since 2010, Dr. Schwartz has served on the board of Brooks Automation, Inc. |
Qualifications required of all directors
The Board requires that each director be a person of high integrity with a proven record of success in his or her field and have the ability to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities to the Company. Generally, the Board looks for persons who evidence characteristics of the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; an inquiring and independent mind, practical wisdom and mature judgment; and expertise that is useful to the Company and complementary to the background and experience of other Board members.
In addition, the Board conducts interviews of potential director candidates to assess intangible qualities, including the individual’s ability to ask difficult questions and to work collegially and collaboratively. The Board considers diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background and professional experience in evaluating candidates for Board membership. Diversity is important, because the Board believes that a variety of points of view contribute to a more effective decision-making process.
Board skills and composition matrix
The following matrix sets forth, for each director, the skills they bring to the Board; their age and Board tenure; the number of other public company boards on which they serve; their independence; and other qualities and experiences that contribute to diverse perspectives.
Director | Skills* | Age | Tenure | # of other public company boards | Independent | Racially/ Ethnically diverse | Gender diverse | Veteran status | ||||||||
Borer | ![]() |
67 | 8 | 1 | ![]() | |||||||||||
Fogarty | ![]() |
62 | 8 | 0 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
Glotzbach | ![]() |
73 | 17 | 0 | ![]() | |||||||||||
Hightman | ![]() |
64 | 0 | 0 | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||
Jones | ![]() |
63 | 6 | 1 | ![]() | |||||||||||
Newberry | ![]() |
68 | 15 | 0 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||
Schwartz | ![]() |
62 | 3 | 1 | ![]() | |||||||||||
Sitherwood | ![]() |
61 | 11 | 1 | CEO | ![]() | ||||||||||
Stupp | ![]() |
71 | 17 | 1 | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||
Van Lokeren | ![]() |
74 | 22 | 0 | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Finance | ![]() |
Strategy/M&A | ![]() |
Audit/Risk management | ![]() |
Regulatory/Government | ![]() |
Regulated utility | ![]() |
Commodity marketing |
Corporate governance at a glance
Board independence | • Our Board chair is independent • Nine out of our 10 directors are independent • Our CEO is the only non-independent director • Among other duties, our chair leads quarterly executive sessions of the independent directors to discuss certain matters without management present | |
Board composition and diversity | • The Board consists of 10 directors • The Board includes five women and five men; two of our directors are racially diverse • The Board regularly assesses its performance through Board and committee self-evaluations, as well as peer reviews of individual directors • The corporate governance committee regularly leads the full Board in considering Board competencies and refreshment to align with Company strategy; a new, diverse director was added to the Board in November 2021 • The Board is actively engaged in Board succession planning and has adopted the Board of Directors Succession Planning and Diversity Policy • Directors are required to retire from the Board at the annual meeting after reaching age 75 | |
Board committees | • We have four Board committees—audit, compensation and human resources, corporate governance and strategy; audit and corporate governance are chaired by female directors • All committees (except for the strategy committee on which our CEO serves) are composed entirely of independent directors • The Board periodically rotates committee chairs and members | |
Leadership structure | • Our Board chair is independent • The Board members elect our chair annually | |
Risk oversight | • Our full Board is responsible for risk oversight and has designated specific committees to lead the oversight efforts with regard to certain key risks • Our Board oversees management as it fulfills its responsibilities for the assessment and management of risks | |
Open communication | • We encourage open communication and strong working relationships among the chair, the CEO and the other directors • Our directors have access to management and employees | |
Director stock ownership | • Our directors are required to own shares of our common stock equal in value to at least six times their annual cash retainer, or $570,000; they may not dispose of shares until they reach this level | |
Accountability to shareholders | • We use majority voting in director elections (plurality voting in contested elections) • We actively reach out to our shareholders through our engagement program • Shareholders can contact our Board, chair or management by regular mail | |
Management succession planning | • The Board actively monitors our succession planning and personnel development and receives regular updates on employee engagement matters |
Board and committee structure
Our Board currently consists of 10 directors, nine of whom are independent. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the chair may be an officer or may be an independent member of the Board, at the discretion of the Board. The Board believes it should be free to use its business judgment to determine what is best for the Company in light of all the circumstances. Mr. Glotzbach is currently chair of the Board.
As chair, Mr. Glotzbach leads the Board in the performance of its duties by working with the chief executive officer to establish meeting agendas and content, engaging with the leadership team between meetings and providing overall guidance as to the Board’s views and perspective.
Ms. Sitherwood, as chief executive officer, focuses on setting the strategy for the Company, overseeing daily operations, developing our leaders and promoting employee engagement throughout the Company.
During the 2021 fiscal year, there were 10 meetings of our Board of Directors. All directors attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and applicable committee meetings, and all directors attended the last annual meeting of shareholders.
The standing committees of the Board of Directors include the audit, compensation and human resources, corporate governance and strategy committees. During fiscal year 2021, the Board delegated authority and responsibility for oversight of environmental, social and governance issues to the compensation and human resources, corporate governance and strategy committees as follows:
• | Oversees the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and progress toward established targets related to such initiatives; and employee recruitment, retention, development and succession planning efforts that support such targets. | |
• | Receives periodic updates and provides guidance to management on human resources matters, including special initiatives; employee development, engagement and wellbeing; and the annual culture survey. |
• | Oversees the corporate governance practices of the Board and the Company, and recommends to the Board such changes as the committee deems appropriate. |
– | Management assists with this effort by timely keeping the committee apprised of the corporate governance practices of the Board and Company that are not consistent with leading practice. |
• | Oversees the Company’s strategy, plan and efforts to be carbon neutral by midcentury, as well as other related environmental initiatives, and progress toward established targets in these areas. | |
• | Oversees the results of the Company’s safety and reliability initiatives. | |
• | Receives periodic updates regarding the development and implementation of a supplier diversity program. |
Board evaluation process
The corporate governance committee supports the Board in its development and maintenance of the Board succession plan. Each year, the corporate governance committee leads the Board in discussions regarding whether the Board possesses the appropriate mix of experiences, skills, attributes and tenure that it needs to provide oversight and direction in light of our Company’s current and future business environment and strategic direction, all with the objective of recommending a group of directors that can best continue our success and represent our shareholders’ interests. As part of this discussion, the committee seeks specific input from directors regarding the individual directors whose terms expire at the next annual meeting. The corporate governance committee and Board are committed to developing a diverse pool of potential candidates for future Board service and maintaining a diverse and well-rounded Board.
In an effort to ensure that the directors possess the necessary and appropriate skills and knowledge, all incoming directors participate in the Company’s orientation for new directors, and the corporate governance committee identifies educational programs on topics appropriate for public-company board members, which the directors are encouraged to attend. Additionally, management arranges for speakers during Board and committee meetings to address timely topics, such as audit, compensation and governance. During the Board’s annual strategy session, directors hear presentations from, and engage in discussions with, speakers on numerous strategic and educational topics.
The Board, under the guidance of Mr. Glotzbach, is currently in the process of documenting a long-term Board succession plan that encompasses Board structure, mandatory and potential director and senior officer retirements, the evolving strategy of the Company, and the current and future skills and attributes required for the Board to effectively perform its oversight role.
Board committees and their membership
The following chart shows the fiscal year 2021 membership of our Board committees, committee meetings and committee member attendance while serving on the committee.
Our Board has delegated certain of its responsibilities to committees to provide for more efficient Board operations and allow directors to engage in deeper analysis and oversight in specific areas. The members and committee chairs are appointed by the Board on recommendations from the corporate governance committee. The chair of each committee helps develop the agenda for that committee and updates the Board after each regular committee meeting and otherwise as appropriate. Each committee reviews its charter annually. The primary responsibilities and membership of each committee are below:
Audit committee | ||
Members: Ms. Fogarty (Chair) Mr. Glotzbach Mr. Jones Ms. Newberry Meetings in fiscal 2021: 4 |
Key responsibilities: The audit committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling the Board’s oversight responsibilities with respect to the quality and integrity of the financial statements, financial reporting process and systems of internal controls. The audit committee also assists the Board in monitoring the independence and performance of the independent registered public accountant, the internal audit department and the operation of ethics and compliance programs. | |
All audit committee members were determined by the Board to be independent and financially literate in accordance with New York Stock Exchange requirements. Ms. Fogarty has been determined to be the financial expert for the audit committee. The audit committee report is included on page 59. |
Compensation and human resources committee | ||
Members: Mr. Borer (Chair) Mr. Glotzbach Mr. Stupp Ms. Van Lokeren Meetings in fiscal 2021: 6 |
Key responsibilities: The compensation and human resources committee assists the Board in the discharge of its responsibilities relative to the compensation of the Company’s executives, reviews and makes recommendations to the Board relative to the Company’s incentive compensation and equity-based plans, reviews management’s risk assessment of the Company’s compensation practices and programs, assists the Board in the oversight of succession planning for executive officers and oversees the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and the investments of the qualified defined benefit pension plans. The committee also reviews and provides feedback to management on key aspects of the Company’s human resources policies and programs, including employee recruitment, retention and development. | |
All compensation and human resources committee members were determined by the Board to be independent in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange requirements. The committee engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC (“Semler Brossy”) as its independent compensation consultant for fiscal year 2021.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation: There are no compensation and human resources committee interlocks and no insiders are members of the committee.
The compensation and human resources committee report is included on page 47. |
Corporate governance committee | ||
Members: Ms. Newberry (Chair) Ms. Fogarty Dr. Schwartz Mr. Stupp Ms. Van Lokeren Meetings in fiscal 2021: 4 |
Key responsibilities: The corporate governance committee: • Considers and makes recommendations to the Board relative to corporate governance and its Corporate Governance Guidelines; • Assists the Board in annually assessing what skills would be beneficial to the Company for the Board to possess and whether those skills are represented sufficiently by the existing members and identifying individuals qualified to become Board members; • With input from Total Rewards Strategies, makes recommendations to the Board regarding director compensation; • Assists the Board in identifying appropriate educational opportunities for Board members and encouraging periodic attendance; • Periodically arranges for Board education sessions addressing timely governance topics; • Reviews and approves any related-party transactions; • Recommends committee chair and member appointments to the full Board; • Oversees periodic outreach to institutional shareholders regarding governance topics to assist the Board in staying informed; and • Oversees the development of the CSR report. | |
All corporate governance committee members were determined by the Board to be independent in accordance with New York Stock Exchange requirements. |
Strategy committee | ||
Members: Mr. Jones (Chair) Mr. Borer Mr. Glotzbach Dr. Schwartz Ms. Sitherwood Meetings in fiscal 2021: 4 |
Key responsibilities: The strategy committee oversees the development of the Company’s corporate strategy, including the Company’s long-range strategic plan and advanced strategy, as well as its strategy in the areas of innovation; investment; acquisitions and development opportunities; and public affairs. The committee also oversees the plan and efforts to be carbon neutral by midcentury, as well as other related environmental initiatives and supplier diversity. |
Risk oversight
Management is responsible for assessing and managing risk exposures on a day-to-day basis, and the Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management. In its oversight role, the Board and its committees ensure that the Company promotes a risk-aware culture and decision-making process. More specifically, the Board has oversight responsibility for the Company’s overall business risk management process, which includes the identification, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring of key business risks on a companywide basis. The Board has delegated certain risk oversight responsibilities to its committees.
Audit committee |
Compensation and human resources committee |
Strategy committee |
Corporate governance committee | |||
The audit committee oversees risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including compliance with all legal and regulatory requirements and internal control over financial reporting. | The compensation and human resources committee oversees risks associated with: • The Company’s compensation policies and practices and ensures that the incentive and other forms of pay do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking; • Executive officer succession planning; • Pension plan funding; and • Company culture and workforce composition. |
The strategy committee oversees the risks associated with the Company’s: • Long-range plan, investment strategies, capital structure and financial needs; • Growth strategies; and • Plan and efforts to be carbon neutral by midcentury, as well as other related environmental initiatives.
|
The corporate governance committee oversees risks associated with corporate governance, including Board leadership structure and director succession planning, and the Corporate Social Responsibility report. |
At the management level, the Company has an officer charged with overseeing the implementation of the enterprise risk management process at the Company. The officer’s efforts are supported by the Board of Directors, Leadership Council and several other leaders across the Company who guide the effort to develop, document and maintain risk mitigation plans. The officer also leads a risk committee that meets throughout the year to assist in identifying, prioritizing and monitoring risks. Because of the use of commodity-based derivatives by three of the Company’s subsidiaries, there is also a risk committee that focuses on the risks and exposures in the commodity-based derivatives markets. The senior leaders of the Company receive periodic updates on the activities of the risk committees, as well as prompt notice of events that may require immediate action by senior leaders.
Cybersecurity is a priority that is regularly addressed by the full Board with the relevant functional leaders of the Company, including in-person reports of the chief information officer and the managing director of information security at Board meetings. The full Board receives and discusses these reports, which focus on the cybersecurity program and related risks, and which provide an update on any events or occurrences. Management also provides updates to the Board between regular Board meetings to the extent events warrant. These updates and discussions enable the Board to oversee and manage the Company’s cybersecurity risks.
The Company’s cybersecurity program includes a process staffed by senior legal, technology, risk and security leaders to evaluate, escalate and communicate cybersecurity incidents. Management also conducts annual phishing exercises, security awareness training, external penetration testing and tabletop exercises and reviews metrics monthly.
During the past year, management, with oversight by the compensation and human resources committee, conducted a risk assessment of the Company’s compensation programs, policies and practices for its employees, including the Company’s executive compensation program and practices. This risk assessment included consideration of the mix and amount of compensation:
The assessment also considered the risk mitigation impact of stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements, Company stock trading and blackout policies, the use of multiple types of metrics, the caps set on incentive compensation, and the role of the compensation and human resources committee and its independent consultant. Management regularly assesses risks related to our compensation programs, including our executive compensation programs. At the compensation and human resources committee’s direction, its independent compensation consultant Semler Brossy and management provide ongoing information regarding compensation factors that could mitigate or encourage excessive risk-taking.
Director independence
The Board of Directors believes that a majority of the directors should be independent and determined that the following members were independent: Borer, Fogarty, Glotzbach, Hightman, Jones, Newberry, Schwartz, Stupp and Van Lokeren. Ms. Sitherwood, president and chief executive officer, is the only non-independent member of the Board. In determining the independence of directors, the Board found that none of the directors, other than Ms. Sitherwood, have any material relationship with the Company other than as a director. In making these determinations, the Board considers all facts and circumstances as well as certain prescribed standards of independence, which are included with our Corporate Governance Guidelines at www.SpireEnergy.com in the Investors/Governance section. The Director Independence Standards adopted by the Board largely reflect the New York Stock Exchange standards, except that our adopted standards provide that the Board need not consider material the provision of natural gas service to any director or immediate family member of the director or director-related company pursuant to the tariffed rates of the Company’s utilities.
The independent members of the Board meet in executive session at least quarterly, which sessions are led by Mr. Glotzbach, the current chair of the Board. Each quarter, the chair solicits from other Board members topics for discussion in those sessions. Topics include, from time to time, the performance of the chief executive officer, executive succession planning, executive compensation matters, Board succession planning and the Company’s strategy.
Corporate governance documents
• | Corporate Governance Guidelines |
• | Charters of each of the audit, compensation and human resources, and corporate governance committees |
• | Code of Business Conduct |
• | Financial Code of Ethics |
• | Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures |
• | Policy Regarding the Approval of Independent Registered Public Accountant Provision of Audit and Non-Audit Services |
• | Director Independence Standards |
All of these documents, other than the Policy Regarding the Approval of Independent Registered Public Accountant Provision of Audit and Non-Audit Services, are available at www.SpireEnergy.com in the Investors/ Governance section, and a copy of any of these documents will be sent to any shareholder upon request.
The Board generally conducts itself in accordance with its Corporate Governance Guidelines. The guidelines, among other matters, provide:
• | the independent directors may elect a lead director if there is no independent chair; |
• | the corporate governance committee will review with the Board, on an annual basis, the requisite skills, characteristics and qualifications to be sought in new Board members as well as the composition of the Board as a whole, including assessments of members’ qualification as independent and consideration of diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board; |
• | a director who retires, changes employment or has any other significant change in his or her professional roles and responsibilities must submit a written offer to resign from the Board; the corporate governance committee will then make a recommendation to the Board regarding appropriate action, taking into account the circumstances at that point in time; |
• | directors must limit their service to a total of three boards of publicly traded companies (including our Company) and should advise the chair of the Board and the corporate governance committee chair before accepting an invitation to serve on another public company board; |
• | directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders and meetings of the Board and the committees on which they serve, and to spend the time needed and meet as frequently as necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities; |
• | the Board and its committees conduct annual assessments of their performance as well as assessments of the performance of each individual director; |
• | directors have access to executives of the Company; |
• | the Board and each committee have the ability to hire independent legal, financial or other advisors as they may deem necessary, at the Company’s expense, without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of the Company; |
• | a director must retire from the Board at the annual meeting of shareholders following the director’s 75th birthday; and |
• | all new directors participate in the Company’s orientation for new directors, and directors are encouraged to attend educational programs. |
We have adopted a written Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures, which is used by our corporate governance committee to determine whether to pre-approve transactions with our directors, executive officers, 5% or greater shareholders, and their immediate family members. The Board voted to remove the $100,000 threshold during fiscal 2021, so the corporate governance committee now reviews all transactions. Based on its consideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances, the committee will decide whether or not to approve the transaction and will approve only those transactions that it determines to be in the best interest of the Company. If the Company becomes aware of an existing transaction with a related party that has not been approved under the policy, the matter will be referred to the committee. The committee will evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction. The policy also includes certain transactions that are deemed pre-approved because they do not pose a significant risk of a conflict of interest. Such pre-approved transactions include the provision of natural gas service to any of the related parties by our utility subsidiaries in accordance with their respective tariffed rates and those transactions at such a level as not to be material to the Company or the related party.
Policy regarding the approval of independent registered public accountant provision of audit and non-audit services
Consistent with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requirements regarding accountant independence, the audit committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence, in fact and appearance, of our independent registered public accountant. To this end, the audit committee adopted a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent accountant. Under the policy, the committee or its designated member must pre-approve services prior to commencement of the specified service. Any pre-approvals by the designated member between meetings will be reported to the audit committee at its next meeting. The requests for pre-approval are submitted to the audit committee or its designated member, as applicable, by both the independent accountant and the Company’s chief financial officer or designee and must include (a) a written description of the services to be provided in detail sufficient to enable the audit committee to make an informed decision with regard to each proposed service and (b) a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SEC’s and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (“PCAOB”) rules on auditor independence. The pre-approval fee levels are established and reviewed by the audit committee periodically, primarily through a quarterly report provided to the audit committee by management. Any proposed services exceeding these levels require specific pre-approval by the audit committee. Generally, after review of the pre-approved services incurred each quarter, the audit committee resets the pre-approval dollar level. At each regularly scheduled audit committee meeting, the audit committee shall review the following:
Audit committee’s review of independent auditor
The audit committee is directly responsible for the appointment, oversight, qualification, independence, performance, compensation and retention of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, including audit fee negotiations and approval. An important element of this oversight is the lead client service partner’s quarterly meetings with Ms. Fogarty, the audit committee chair, and monthly meetings with Mr. Glotzbach, who serves on the audit committee and chairs the Board. Annually, the committee evaluates whether retaining Deloitte as the Company’s independent auditor for the upcoming year is in the best interest of Spire and its shareholders. As part of this analysis, the committee considers, among other factors:
• | how effectively Deloitte is maintaining its independence as demonstrated by exercising judgment, objectivity and professional skepticism; |
• | the quality, candor, timeliness and effectiveness of Deloitte’s communications with the committee and management; |
• | the adequacy of information provided on accounting issues, auditing issues and regulatory developments affecting utility companies; |
• | the lead client service partner’s performance; |
• | whether Deloitte’s known legal risks include involvement in proceedings that could impair its ability to perform the annual audit; |
• | reports of the PCAOB and other available data regarding the quality of work performed by Deloitte; |
• | the ability of Deloitte to meet deadlines and respond quickly; |
• | the geographic reach and expertise of Deloitte in terms of quantity, quality and location of staff; |
• | Deloitte’s long tenure and experience as the Company’s auditor; and |
• | the historical and proposed Deloitte fees charged to the Company. |
The committee also factors in the relative costs, benefits, challenges, overall advisability and potential impact of selecting a different independent public accounting firm.
As part of its role in overseeing the external auditors, the committee is responsible for the selection of the Deloitte lead client service partner, and as required by law, ensures rotation of the lead partner every five years. At the beginning of the new lead partner selection process, Deloitte provides a list of candidates to members of senior management, who, in turn, evaluate and interview the candidates and submit a recommendation to the committee. The committee considers senior management’s recommendations and those of Deloitte leadership; evaluates the qualifications, strengths and weaknesses of the candidates; and selects the lead client service partner.
Other key governance policies and practices
The Spire Board amended the Company’s bylaws in November 2021 to provide for plurality voting in the event the election of directors is contested.
The Board amended the Company’s bylaws in November 2021 to require that if a nominee for director who is an incumbent director is not elected and no successor has been elected at such meeting, the director must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board of Directors. The corporate governance committee is required to make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken.
The Board has adopted a written policy acknowledging the importance of diversity in its broadest sense in the boardroom as a driver of Board effectiveness. Diversity encompasses diversity of perspective, experience, background (including nationality), personality type, cognitive and personal strengths and other personal attributes, as well as diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds.
During the past year, our Board’s succession planning efforts have focused primarily on the composition of our Board and its committees; the individual skill sets of current members and additional skills that could be beneficial for the Board and its committees in light of the Company’s strategy and emerging risks; upcoming retirements under our director retirement policy; our commitment to Board diversity; and strategies for identifying and recruiting new directors. Each director provided written input in response to a survey distributed by the corporate governance committee soliciting thoughts concerning the skills and attributes that the Board and individual directors should possess. The Board’s subsequent conversations and approach were informed by the results of this survey, our Company’s engagement with shareholders and other stakeholders as well as the Board’s annual self-evaluation and director nomination processes. Our Board is focused on balancing new perspectives and the experience of existing directors while undergoing an orderly transition of roles and responsibilities on the Board and its committees. The Board worked with a firm that helped it determine the skills and attributes that the Board should seek in new directors and identify and recruit candidates that possess the desired characteristics.
A key responsibility of the CEO and the Board is ensuring that an effective process is in place to provide continuity of leadership over the long term at all levels in our Company. To that end, management has implemented a structured succession-planning program throughout Spire. Succession planning for the CEO and executive officers is directly overseen by the Board and the compensation and human resources committee, which conducts an annual review of the succession plans for our CEO and other executives and receives periodic updates on the plans. Our CEO and the compensation and human resources committee, in turn, review the succession plans annually with the full Board.
These succession plans reflect the Board’s belief that internal candidates for the CEO and other executive positions should be regularly identified and that diverse candidates should be developed for consideration when a transition is planned or necessary. Accordingly, management has identified internal candidates in various phases of development and has implemented development plans to ensure the candidates’ readiness. The development plans identify the candidates’ strengths and developmental opportunities, and the compensation and human resources committee receives periodic updates and regularly reviews the candidates’ progress. As part of the process, the Board engages with potential successors at Board meetings and in less formal settings to allow directors to personally assess candidates. Although Spire prefers to develop successors from existing employees, to ensure selection of the best person for the role, the Company may recruit externally if doing so would better suit strategic needs.
The compensation and human resources committee believes that the Company’s succession planning process provides a good structure to ensure that the Company will have qualified successors for its executive officers. The Board has adopted a plan that establishes the process for addressing the unexpected absence of the CEO that may occur as a result of death, illness, disability or sudden departure. This plan also addresses the unexpected absence of key executive officers.
We have a policy that addresses recoupment of amounts from executive officers’ and other employees’ performance-based awards under the annual and equity incentive plans to the extent that they would have been materially less due to inaccurate financial statements, fraud or intentional, willful or gross misconduct.
Our policy on the purchase and sale of securities prohibits executive officers and board members from: (1) entering into hedging transactions with respect to Company securities, including, without limitation, through the use of financial instruments such as exchange funds, prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, puts, calls, collars, forwards and other derivative instruments, or through the establishment of a short position in the Company’s securities; and (2) holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock as collateral for a loan. Negative pledges are not prohibited by this policy.
On a monthly basis, Mr. Glotzbach, the chair of the Board, meets with our CEO and certain members of the management team, depending on the topics to be discussed. This is an opportunity for management to have timely conversations with the chair regarding key Company updates. The topics discussed typically include progress on strategic initiatives, leadership development and management succession planning, governance items and financial updates. After the meeting, Mr. Glotzbach prepares summary notes and shares them with the other directors to ensure they are up-to-date on significant developments. Mr. Glotzbach is also accessible to management on an as-needed basis between monthly meetings, exchanging text messages and emails and engaging in telephone conversations to provide guidance and oversight on key, time-sensitive issues. Committee chairs are similarly available to management on an as-needed basis.
Our investor relations and corporate governance teams reach out to our largest institutional investors biannually, seeking their input and feedback regarding governance topics and our disclosure practices. This year we specifically requested feedback on our proxy statement and governance disclosures. We continue to seek input and guidance on our environmental, social and governance practices and disclosures, as well.
Shareholder nominee recommendations and nominee qualifications
Shareholders who wish to recommend nominees to the corporate governance committee should make their submission to the committee by September 29 preceding the annual meeting by submitting it to:
Correspondence with the Board
Those who desire to communicate with the independent directors should send correspondence addressed to:
All appropriate correspondence is forwarded directly to the chair of the Board. The Company does not, however, forward spam, sales, marketing or mass mailing materials; product or service complaints or inquiries; new product or service suggestions; resumes and other forms of job inquiries; or surveys. However, any filtered information is available to any director upon request.
Directors’ compensation
The corporate governance committee periodically reviews director compensation relative to data of the Company’s comparator group provided by its independent consultant, which was Total Rewards Strategies during fiscal year 2021. The basic retainers and fees payable in fiscal year 2021 are set forth below. No retainers or fees are paid to directors who are executives or employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Annual Board cash retainer | $ | 95,000 | ||
Annual Board stock retainer | 110,000 | |||
Chair of the Board annual retainer | 100,000 | |||
Audit committee chair annual retainer | 15,000 | |||
Compensation and human resources committee chair annual retainer | 12,500 | |||
Corporate governance committee chair annual retainer | 10,000 | |||
Other committee chair annual retainer | 10,000 |
The amount and form of the annual Board retainer are fixed annually by vote of the Board. Each year, the corporate governance committee reviews peer and market research on amounts and structure of board of director fees and makes a recommendation to the Board regarding the amount and structure of the Board fees. Since February 1, 2019, the annual retainer has been $205,000, of which the cash portion is $95,000 and $110,000 is payable in shares of our common stock.
Beginning February 1, 2022, the annual retainer will increase to $220,000, of which the cash portion will be $100,000 and $120,000 will be payable in shares of our common stock. The number of shares is determined by dividing the total equity grant value by the closing stock price of our common stock on the grant date and rounding to the nearest ten shares. There are no additional meeting fees. The directors’ stock ownership requirement is six times the annual cash retainer. Also beginning February 1, 2022, the compensation and human resources committee chair retainer will be $15,000; the corporate governance committee chair retainer will be $13,000; and the strategy committee chair retainer will be $13,000.
The Company’s Deferred Income Plan (“DIP”) allows directors to elect to defer all or a portion of their annual fees and equity awards. If a director elects to defer all or a portion of the annual equity grant, the deferred portion is awarded as phantom shares and upon vesting an amount of money equal to the value of the shares at vesting is credited to the Company Stock Fund in the director’s DIP account. Dividends paid on deferred equity will be credited to the director’s DIP account to any fund instructed by the director other than the Company Stock Fund. Directors may not transfer deferred equity out of the Company Stock Fund until after he or she retires from the Board. Directors who elect to defer all or a portion of their annual Board fees may invest their deferred fees in any fund in the DIP other than the Company Stock Fund.
The Board has imposed a limit of $400,000 per director on the annual amount of the restricted stock retainer that could be approved by the Board for payment to independent directors. The table below discloses the compensation paid or earned by all those who served as Company directors in fiscal year 2021. Not included in the table is the Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors in which participation and benefits have been frozen since November 1, 2002. Under that plan, a non-employee director who had at least five years of service as a director of the Company or its predecessor as of November 1, 2002, qualified for an annual payment after retirement in an amount equal to the Board retainer at November 1, 2002 ($18,000), with such payments being made for the longer of 10 years or life. The only current director eligible for benefits under the plan is Ms. Van Lokeren.
Name | Fees earned or paid in cash | Stock awards | (1) | Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings | (2) | Total | ||||||||||
Borer | $ | 107,500 | $ | 109,736 | $ | 20,802 | $ | 238,038 | ||||||||
Fogarty | 110,000 | 109,736 | 11,231 | 230,967 | ||||||||||||
Glotzbach | 195,000 | 109,736 | 156,129 | 460,865 | ||||||||||||
Jones | 105,000 | 109,736 | – | 214,736 | ||||||||||||
Newberry | 105,000 | 109,736 | 11,511 | 226,247 | ||||||||||||
Schwartz | 95,000 | 109,736 | – | 204,736 | ||||||||||||
Stupp | 95,000 | 109,736 | – | 204,736 | ||||||||||||
Van Lokeren | 95,000 | 109,736 | 180,921 | 385,657 |
(1) | Amounts calculated are the grant date fair value of awards granted during the fiscal year using the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (FASB ASC Topic 718). See Note 3, Stock-Based Compensation, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2021 10-K for a discussion regarding the manner in which the fair value of these awards is calculated, including assumptions used. |
The table below provides more details relative to the restricted stock awards made under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan that have not yet vested: |
Name | Number of shares awarded in fiscal year 2021 | Number of phantom shares awarded in fiscal year 2021 | Aggregate number of shares awarded and not vested at 2021 fiscal year end | |||||||||
Borer | – | 1,760 | – | |||||||||
Fogarty | 1,760 | – | – | |||||||||
Glotzbach | 1,760 | – | – | |||||||||
Jones | 1,760 | – | – | |||||||||
Newberry | 1,760 | – | – | |||||||||
Schwartz | – | 1,760 | – | |||||||||
Stupp | – | 1,760 | – | |||||||||
Van Lokeren | 1,760 | – | – |
The February 2021 grants of 1,760 restricted shares or phantom units under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan had a six-month vesting requirement and vested on August 1, 2021, for all non-employee directors. | |
(2) | Represents above-market earnings in fiscal year 2021 on deferrals of fees and retainers by participating directors in the Deferred Income Plans. |
Beneficial ownership of Spire stock
The following table shows, as of November 1, 2021, the number of shares of our common and preferred stock beneficially owned by (i) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, (ii) each current director and director nominee, (iii) each named executive officer listed in the “Summary compensation table” and (iv) all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group.
Name | Common shares beneficially owned | (1) | Percentage of common shares beneficially owned | Depositary shares of Series A preferred stock beneficially owned | Percentage of Series A preferred shares beneficially owned | Phantom shares owned | (13) | |||||||
M. A. Borer | 10,900 | (2) | * | – | 2,090 | |||||||||
M. C. Darrell | 55,174 | (3) | * | – | 5,949 | |||||||||
M. V. Fogarty | 12,990 | (4) | * | – | – | |||||||||
M. C. Geiselhart | 26,252 | (3) | * | – | 5,670 | |||||||||
E. L. Glotzbach | 30,140 | (5) | * | 8,000 | * | – | ||||||||
C. J. Hightman | – | * | – | – | ||||||||||
R. L. Jones | 9,190 | * | – | – | ||||||||||
S. L. Lindsey | 44,677 | (3) | * | – | 5,203 | |||||||||
B. D. Newberry | 23,840 | * | – | – | ||||||||||
S. P. Rasche | 36,421 | (3)(6) | * | 7,797 | * | 3,356 | ||||||||
S. S. Schwartz | 1,470 | * | – | 3,080 | ||||||||||
S. Sitherwood | 121,915 | (3)(7) | * | – | 30,826 | |||||||||
J. P. Stupp | 1,121,160 | (8) | 2.17% | – | 3,080 | |||||||||
M. A. Van Lokeren | 29,575 | (9) | * | – | – | |||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 5,943,963 | (10) | 11.50% | |||||||||||
American Century Companies, Inc. | 5,148,502 | (11) | 9.97% | |||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 4,847,707 | (12) | 9.38% | |||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (17) | 1,533,288 | 2.97% |
(1) | Except as otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to all the shares listed. |
(2) | These shares are held in a revocable family trust of which Mr. Borer and his spouse are trustees and share voting and dispositive power. |
(3) | Includes restricted non-vested shares granted under the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as to which a recipient has sole voting power and no current investment power as follows: M. C. Darrell – 1,420; M. C. Geiselhart – 1,350; S. L. Lindsey – 4,250; S. P. Rasche – 5,780; S. Sitherwood – 7,300. Includes 2,356 shares held by Mr. Rasche’s account in the 401(k) plan. |
(4) | These shares held in a revocable family trust of which Ms. Fogarty and her spouse are trustees and share voting and dispositive power. |
(5) | 25,440 of these shares are held in a revocable family trust of which Mr. Glotzbach and his spouse are trustees and share voting and dispositive power; the remainder are held in an IRA account over which Mr. Glotzbach has sole voting and dispositive power. |
(6) | Includes 34,065 shares held in a revocable family trust of which Mr. Rasche and his spouse are trustees and share voting and dispositive power. |
(7) | These shares are held in a revocable family trust of which Ms. Sitherwood is trustee. |
(8) | Includes 1,104,000 shares owned by Stupp Bros., Inc. Mr. Stupp is a director and executive officer of Stupp Bros., Inc. and has an interest in a voting trust that controls 100% of the stock of Stupp Bros., Inc., which is located at 3800 Weber Road, St. Louis, MO 63125. The Stupp Bros., Inc. shares are subject to a negative pledge. |
(9) | These shares are held in a revocable trust of which Ms. Van Lokeren is the trustee. |
(10) | Information provided as of December 31, 2020, in Schedule 13G filed on January 27, 2021, by BlackRock, Inc., whose address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. The report indicates that it has 5,858,096 shares with sole voting power, 5,943,963 shares with sole investment power, and no shares with shared voting power or shared investment power. The subsidiaries included in the report were as follows: |
BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V. | BlackRock Fund Advisors† |
BlackRock Advisors, LLC | BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. |
BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited | BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited |
BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited | BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited |
BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG | BlackRock Investment Management, LLC |
BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. | BlackRock Life Limited |
† | BlackRock Fund Advisors is a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. and beneficially owns 5% or greater of the outstanding shares of the Company’s stock according to the report. No other subsidiary included in the report owns 5% or greater of the outstanding shares of the Company’s stock according to the report. |
(11) | Information provided as of December 31, 2020, in Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2021, by American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”), whose address is 4500 Main Street, 9th Floor, Kansas City, MO 64111. The report indicates that it has 4,905,074 shares with sole voting power, 5,148,502 shares with sole investment power, and no shares with shared voting power or shared investment power. ACC is controlled by Stowers Institute for Medical Research, which is a beneficial owner of securities that are the subject of the report. American Century Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of ACC and an investment adviser registered under §203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. |
(12) | Information provided as of December 31, 2020, in Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2021, by The Vanguard Group, Inc., whose address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. The report indicates that it has 0 shares with sole voting power, 4,720,492 shares with sole investment power, 81,849 shares with shared voting power and 127,215 shares with shared investment power. The subsidiaries in the report, none of which owns 5% or greater of the Company’s shares, were: |
(13) | For executive officers and non-employee directors, respectively, this column includes time-based restricted stock grants that were deferred by the respective executive officer or non-employee director pursuant to the terms of Spire’s Deferred Income Plan and, therefore, granted as phantom shares. Phantom shares are payable in cash and do not have voting rights. The phantom shares owned by the executive officers have not yet vested. |
The following table sets forth aggregate information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plan as of September 30, 2021.
Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) | |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 307,926 | $– | 365,338 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | – | – | – | |||
Total | 307,926 | $– | 365,338 |
Stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements for non-employee directors and executive officers
To provide a direct link between director, executive officer and shareholder interests, the Company adopted a stock ownership policy. The table below indicates the number of shares directors and executive officers are expected to own under the policy.
Directors must retain 90% and executive officers must retain 75% of the net shares awarded to them under Company plans until they meet the stock ownership requirements. All directors and executive officers are currently in compliance with the stock ownership policy.
Proposal 2: Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers
As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are seeking your approval of the Company’s compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Although the vote on this proposal is advisory and nonbinding, the compensation and human resources committee and Board will review the results of the vote and consider the collective views of our shareholders in future determinations concerning our executive compensation program generally and the compensation of our named executive officers in particular.
As noted in the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Company’s philosophy is to pay for performance by making compensation decisions based on what promotes our corporate strategy, creates shareholder value and remains equitable for the Company, its employees and its shareholders. In the process of making these decisions, we also consider the types and levels of compensation in the marketplace. We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, which discusses in more detail our compensation policies and procedures. Throughout the year, our compensation and human resources committee assesses our compensation programs to ensure they are consistent with our pay philosophy. In determining how to vote on this proposal, please consider our compensation governance and pay structure:
• | Recoupment: Our policy addresses recoupment of amounts from executive officers’ and other employees’ performance-based awards under the annual and equity incentive plans to the extent that they would have been materially less due to inaccurate financial statements, fraud or intentional, willful or gross misconduct. |
• | Prohibition of hedging/pledging of stock: Our policy on the purchase and sale of securities prohibits executive officers and board members from (1) entering into hedging transactions with respect to Company securities, including, without limitation, through the use of financial instruments such as exchange funds, prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, puts, calls, collars, forwards and other derivative instruments, or through the establishment of a short position in the Company’s securities; and (2) holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock as collateral for a loan. |
• | Stock ownership requirements: Our stock ownership requirements, which are outlined on page 28, further strengthen the alignment of our executives with our shareholders. |
• | Compensation balance: Most of the compensation to the named executive officers is aligned with corporate performance in areas related to our customers, our shareholders and our employees. The Company seeks to balance short-term and longer-term compensation opportunities to ensure that the Company meets short-term objectives while continuing to produce value for its shareholders over the long term. |
• | Independent compensation consultant: The compensation and human resources committee’s consultant is independent. |
• | Modest perquisites: The Company’s use of perquisites is modest. |
• | Caps on incentive awards: We have limits on incentive compensation, which cap all potential annual incentive plan awards at 150% of target and all equity incentive plan awards at 200% of target. |
• | No employment agreements or excise tax gross-up: The Company does not enter into employment agreements or provide excise tax gross-up protections. |
• | No additional years of service credited: The supplemental pension plans are traditional plans that cover the compensation not included in the qualified pension plan due solely to tax limitations, and do not otherwise factor in additional compensation or additional years of service. |
The Board of Directors is asking shareholders to support the Company’s named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement. The compensation and human resources committee and the Board of Directors believe the compensation program effectively implements the Company’s compensation principles and policies, achieves the Company’s compensation objectives, and aligns the interests of the executives and shareholders. Accordingly, the Board asks shareholders to cast a nonbinding vote “FOR” the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and other related disclosures.”
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”)
This CD&A contains a detailed description of the Company’s executive compensation program, including our compensation philosophy, the elements of compensation that we provide to our named executive officers (“NEOs”), the process that is undertaken to determine awards of compensation and the actual compensation provided to our NEOs in fiscal year 2021.
Our named executive officers
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Suzanne
Sitherwood |
Steven
P. Rasche |
Steven
L. Lindsey |
Mark
C. Darrell |
Michael
C. Geiselhart | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer |
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer |
Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer |
Compensation and human resources committee report
The Committee has reviewed and discussed with Company management the CD&A section included in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that this CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in the 2021 10-K.
Executive compensation tables
The table that follows presents information about compensation for the Company’s NEOs for the last three completed fiscal years.
Salary includes amounts earned in each fiscal year. With regard to fiscal year 2021, the Committee determined at its November 2020 meeting that officer salaries would remain unchanged from fiscal year 2020 base salary levels. The amounts in this column also include any amounts of salary that the NEO may have deferred under the Spire Employee Savings Plan and the Spire Deferred Income Plan. Salary deferred under the Spire Deferred Income Plan also appears in the “Executive contributions in last FY” column of the “Non-qualified deferred compensation table” later in this proxy statement.
The amounts in this column represent sign-on or discretionary bonuses. No such bonuses were made in fiscal year 2021. Amounts under the Company’s AIP are reported in the “Non-equity incentive plan compensation” column.
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value calculated using the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718 exclusive of the estimate of forfeitures. For those stock awards subject to performance-based conditions, the value reflects the probable outcome as of the grant date.
This column includes incentive payments earned by the NEOs under the AIP. Further details relative to the AIP can be found in the CD&A.
This column includes the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the NEOs’ accumulated benefits under the Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan and the supplemental retirement plans, as well as the above-market or preferential earnings in fiscal year 2021 on deferrals in the deferred income plans.
Name | Year | Salary | Bonus | Stock awards |
(1) | Non-equity incentive plan compensation |
Change in pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings |
(2) | All other compensation |
(3) | Total | |||||
Suzanne
Sitherwood President and Chief Executive Officer |
2021 | $928,558 | $ – | $2,847,634 | $1,318,125 | $291,369 | $183,055 | $5,568,741 | ||||||||
2020 | 928,847 | – | 2,263,409 | 749,250 | 266,064 | 197,156 | 4,404,726 | |||||||||
2019 | 900,096 | – | 2,320,527 | 897,300 | 246,688 | 150,978 | 4,515,589 | |||||||||
Steven
P. Rasche Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
2021 | 458,758 | – | 636,550 | 383,880 | 114,679 | 69,747 | 1,663,614 | ||||||||
2020 | 457,835 | – | 499,151 | 221,182 | 105,967 | 82,760 | 1,366,895 | |||||||||
2019 | 431,373 | – | 553,726 | 256,966 | 93,093 | 61,555 | 1,396,713 | |||||||||
Steven
L. Lindsey Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer |
2021 | 537,058 | – | 939,315 | 569,775 | 83,222 | 82,441 | 2,211,811 | ||||||||
2020 | 531,270 | – | 739,287 | 320,351 | 90,117 | 69,864 | 1,750,889 | |||||||||
2019 | 472,317 | – | 687,995 | 300,337 | 97,248 | 69,864 | 1,627,761 | |||||||||
Mark
C. Darrell Senior Vice President, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer |
2021 | 413,585 | – | 496,708 | 285,825 | 95,392 | 58,261 | 1,349,771 | ||||||||
2020 | 413,600 | – | 387,960 | 166,574 | 125,389 | 71,479 | 1,165,002 | |||||||||
2019 | 398,250 | – | 451,233 | 197,134 | 145,027 | 58,413 | 1,250,057 | |||||||||
Michael
C. Geiselhart Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer |
2021 | 413,585 | – | 474,269 | 285,825 | 115,787 | 47,110 | 1,336,576 | ||||||||
2020 | 415,170 | – | 369,558 | 167,324 | 135,491 | 49,547 | 1,137,090 | |||||||||
2019 | 410,385 | – | 429,796 | 195,336 | 187,613 | 48,678 | 1,271,808 |
(1) | See the Stock-Based Compensation footnote of the consolidated financial statements in the 2021 10-K for discussions regarding the manner in which the fair value of these awards is calculated, including assumptions used. Further information regarding the 2021 awards is included in the “Grants of plan-based awards” table and “Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end table” elsewhere in this proxy statement. The maximum financial impact for the 2021 stock awards for the NEOs is as follows: |
The amounts for stock awards are presented excluding any actual or estimated forfeitures. | |
(2) | The amounts shown below in the “Above-market interest” column are also included in the amounts in the “Aggregate earnings in last FY” column of the “Non-qualified deferred compensation table” for the deferred income plans. |
(3) | The table below provides details on the amounts included in the “all other compensation” column for fiscal year 2021: |
401(k) match |
Perquisites | (a) | Dividend equivalents |
(b) | Dividends | (c) | Deferred dividend equivalents |
(d) | Deferred dividends |
(e) | Other | Total | |||||
Sitherwood | $14,500 | $16,248 | $ – | $22,502 | $89,985 | $39,820 | $ – | $183,055 | |||||||||
Rasche | 14,250 | 17,282 | – | 14,353 | 23,862 | – | – | 69,747 | |||||||||
Lindsey | 14,500 | 18,854 | 19,553 | 11,366 | 9,627 | 8,541 | – | 82,441 | |||||||||
Darrell | 14,500 | 11,897 | – | 4,500 | 20,456 | 6,908 | – | 58,261 | |||||||||
Geiselhart | 14,726 | 2,057 | – | 4,276 | 19,453 | 6,598 | – | 47,110 |
(a) | Perquisites include life insurance premiums, spousal travel, and executive financial and tax planning. | |
(b) | Dividend equivalents are paid on PCSUs at the time of vesting. | |
(c) | Dividends are paid quarterly on TBRSs during the three-year vesting period. | |
(d) | Dividend equivalents on unvested PCSUs that have been deferred under the deferred income plan are contributed to the NEO’s deferred income plan account at the time of vesting. | |
(e) | Dividends on unvested TBRSs that have been deferred under the deferred income plan are contributed to the NEO’s deferred income plan account quarterly during the three-year vesting period. |
The plans under which grants in the table below were made are generally described in the CD&A in the “Annual incentive compensation” and “Long-term incentive compensation” sections.
Under the AIP, performance metrics and potential targets for awards are typically approved in November, with the determinations of earned award amounts made the following November, based upon corporate and individual performance in the most recently completed fiscal year.
Equity awards are generally considered for grant in November each year, with the grant date occurring after the November Committee and Board meetings. Under the EIP, the Committee may grant performance-based awards, stock appreciation rights, stock options, shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards(1) |
Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards(2) |
All other | Grant date | ||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant date |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | (In shares) Target |
Maximum | stock awards |
(3) | fair value of stock awards |
(4) | ||||||||
Sitherwood | 11/23/20 | $462,500 | $925,000 | $1,387,500 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 16,190 | 32,380 | 64,760 | $2,106,523 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 10,790 | 741,111 | |||||||||||||||||
Rasche | 11/23/20 | 137,100 | 274,200 | 411,300 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 3,620 | 7,240 | 14,480 | 471,020 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 2,410 | 165,530 | |||||||||||||||||
Lindsey | 11/23/20 | 200,625 | 401,250 | 601,875 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 5,340 | 10,680 | 21,360 | 694,797 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 3,560 | 244,518 | |||||||||||||||||
Darrell | 11/23/20 | 103,000 | 206,000 | 309,000 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 2,825 | 5,650 | 11,300 | 367,581 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 1,880 | 129,127 | |||||||||||||||||
Geiselhart | 11/23/20 | 103,000 | 206,000 | 309,000 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 2,695 | 5,390 | 10,780 | 350,636 | |||||||||||||||
11/23/20 | 1,880 | 123,633 |
(1) | These columns show the range of possible payouts for AIP in fiscal year 2021. The amounts paid in fiscal year 2022 but earned based upon performance in fiscal year 2021 are included in the “Non-equity incentive plan compensation” column in the “Summary compensation table” and are based on the metrics described in the CD&A. |
(2) | These columns show the range of possible payouts for the PCSU awards granted in fiscal year 2021. |
(3) | This column shows the award of TBRS granted in fiscal year 2021 as to which the restrictions will lapse on November 23, 2023. Details of each grant are listed in the “Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year end table.” |
(4) | This column provides the grant date fair value of PCSU and TBRS awards using the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718, exclusive of the estimate of forfeitures. For those shares in the “Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards” columns, the value reflects the probable outcome on the grant date and is the same as the amount included for such shares in the “Stock awards” column for 2021 in the “Summary compensation table.” |
In November 2020, EIP awards were made to Ms. Sitherwood and Messrs. Rasche, Lindsey, Darrell and Geiselhart. These awards included PCSUs that vest upon the attainment of multi-year performance objectives. Under the terms of the awards, these units may vest if certain corporate performance metrics for the 2021-2023 fiscal year performance period are met or exceeded. The performance metrics for the units granted in fiscal year 2021 are the cumulative three-year average NEEPS over fiscal years 2021-2023 and three-year relative TSR, which are weighted at 50% each. If the performance criteria are not satisfied for the fiscal years 2021-2023 performance period, the awards will be forfeited. At the conclusion of the performance period, payouts can range from 0% to 200% of target for each metric. After vesting, executives are expected to retain 75% of vested shares until their stock ownership requirements are met.
In the event of a change in control, vesting may accelerate at the target level on a pro rata basis if the awards have not already been forfeited and the successor does not assume the award or provide a comparable award, provided that the assumed or replacement award must provide that the vesting will be accelerated if the participant is terminated without cause within 24 months of the change in control. If a participant leaves the Company due to death, disability or retirement, the participant’s award may vest on a pro rata basis if the performance metrics are met. Dividend equivalents on PCSUs are accrued throughout the performance period and paid to the participant in proportion to the number of shares actually earned at vesting. No interest is paid on the accrued dividends. More details on these awards are included in the “Long-term incentive compensation” section of the CD&A.
Name | Stock award grant date |
No. of shares or units of stock that have not vested |
Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested |
(1) | Stock award vesting date |
Equity incentive plan awards: No. of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested |
(2) | Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested | ||||
Sitherwood | 11/14/18 | 7,300 | $446,614 | 11/14/21 | 21,910 | $1,340,454 | ||||||
12/04/19 | 7,380 | 451,508 | 11/21/22 | 22,140 | 1,354,525 | |||||||
11/23/20 | 10,790 | 660,132 | 11/23/23 | 32,380 | 1,981,008 | |||||||
Rasche | 11/14/18 | 1,740 | 106,453 | 11/14/21 | 5,230 | 319,971 | ||||||
12/04/19 | 1,630 | 99,723 | 11/21/22 | 4,880 | 298,558 | |||||||
11/23/20 | 2,410 | 147,444 | 11/23/23 | 7,240 | 442,943 | |||||||
Lindsey | 11/14/18 | 2,160 | 132,149 | 11/14/21 | 6,500 | 397,670 | ||||||
12/04/19 | 2,410 | 147,444 | 11/21/22 | 7,232 | 442,454 | |||||||
11/23/20 | 3,560 | 217,801 | 11/23/23 | 10,680 | 653,402 | |||||||
Darrell | 11/14/18 | 1,420 | 86,876 | 11/14/21 | 4,260 | 260,627 | ||||||
12/04/19 | 1,260 | 77,087 | 11/21/22 | 3,800 | 232,484 | |||||||
11/23/20 | 1,880 | 115,018 | 11/23/23 | 5,650 | 345,667 | |||||||
Geiselhart | 11/14/18 | 1,350 | 82,593 | 11/14/21 | 4,060 | 248,391 | ||||||
12/04/19 | 1,200 | 73,416 | 11/21/22 | 3,620 | 221,472 | |||||||
11/23/20 | 1,800 | 110,124 | 11/23/23 | 5,390 | 329,760 |
(1) | The dollar amounts in this column reflect the value calculated at $61.18 per share, the closing price of the Company stock on September 30, 2021. The percentage of equity awards deferred under the Spire Deferred Income Plan in fiscal year 2021 are as follows. TBRS were not eligible for deferral until 2019. |
(2) | Vesting dates, performance periods and levels of awards, assuming performance metrics are met, are provided below: |
Grant date |
Performance period |
Vesting date | Name | Threshold | Target | Maximum |
11/14/18 | 10/1/18-9/30/21 | 11/14/21 | Sitherwood | 10,955 | 21,910 | 43,820 |
Rasche | 2,615 | 5,230 | 10,460 | |||
Lindsey | 3,250 | 6,500 | 13,000 | |||
Darrell | 2,130 | 4,260 | 8,520 | |||
Geiselhart | 2,030 | 4,060 | 8,120 | |||
12/04/19 | 10/1/19-9/30/22 | 12/04/22 | Sitherwood | 11,070 | 22,140 | 44,280 |
Rasche | 2,440 | 4,880 | 9,760 | |||
Lindsey | 3,616 | 7,232 | 14,464 | |||
Darrell | 1,900 | 3,800 | 7,600 | |||
Geiselhart | 1,810 | 3,620 | 7,240 | |||
11/23/20 | 10/1/20-9/30/23 | 11/23/23 | Sitherwood | 16,190 | 32,380 | 64,760 |
Rasche | 3,620 | 7,240 | 14,480 | |||
Lindsey | 5,340 | 10,680 | 21,360 | |||
Darrell | 2,825 | 5,650 | 11,300 | |||
Geiselhart | 2,695 | 5,390 | 10,780 |
None of the NEOs held any exercisable stock options in fiscal year 2021, so those columns have been omitted from the table below. The value column reflects the shares acquired on vesting multiplied by the closing price on the vesting date.
The NEOs participate in the Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan, a qualified defined benefit plan sponsored by Spire Missouri Inc.
Effective January 1, 2009, Spire Missouri Inc. amended its plan to change the way benefits are calculated. Prior to that date, the plan provided benefits based on a final pay formula that used a participant’s years of credited service and average final compensation. The average final compensation is the highest consecutive three-year average of the final 10 years of employment. Participants’ years of credited service under the plan were frozen as of December 31, 2008; however, the average final pay was not frozen and will continue to be based on the highest three-year average in the final 10 years of employment. Benefits under the plan formula in effect prior to January 1, 2009 are referred to as “grandfathered benefits.” With respect to annual incentive compensation paid on or after January 1, 2013, average final compensation will exclude such incentive compensation for purposes of the grandfathered benefit. Of the NEOs, only Mr. Darrell and Mr. Geiselhart have grandfathered benefits.
While normal retirement age under the plan is age 65, participants may retire at age 60 with 10 or more years of service without reduction of the grandfathered benefit for early retirement. As Mr. Darrell and Mr. Geiselhart are both age 60 or older, immediate retirement is assumed in calculating their grandfathered benefits.
On and after January 1, 2009, the plan uses a cash balance formula that provides: (i) a cash balance credit between 4 and 10% of compensation (base salary and annual incentive compensation) depending on the participant’s age, and (ii) interest credits using a rate equal to an average of corporate bond rates published by the Internal Revenue Service. Benefits under the plan formula in effect on and after January 1, 2009 are referred to as “current benefits.” The cash balance credit and interest credit are applied as of December 31 of each year, on an average monthly basis, with interest compounded monthly. For calendar year 2021, cash balance credits were as follows:
The early retirement amount of the current benefits will be the amount credited in the participant’s cash balance account in the case of a lump-sum payment. If an annuity is taken at early retirement, the benefit will be the actuarial equivalent of the lump-sum amount.
The Code generally places a limit on the amount of the annual pension that can be paid from a qualified defined benefit plan as well as on the amount of annual earnings that can be used to calculate a pension benefit. Since 1977, Spire Missouri Inc. has maintained a Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, a non-qualified plan that covers pension benefits that accrued through December 31, 2004 and that pays eligible employees the difference between the amount payable under the qualified plan and the amount they would have received without the limits on the qualified plan or without any deferred income plan contributions. Spire Missouri Inc. adopted the Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan II to comply with Code Section 409A, which covers grandfathered pension benefits accrued on and after January 1, 2005. It also adopted the Cash Balance Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, which covers cash balance benefits accruing on and after January 1, 2009.
• | the Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plans are unfunded and subject to reduction or forfeiture in the event of the Company’s bankruptcy; |
• | the years of credited service in the table are the same as the executives’ years of actual service as of December 31, 2008, when years of service were frozen for all participants; |
• | the compensation used to determine current and grandfathered benefits under the plans include the amounts in the “Salary” column and the amount attributable to payments under the AIP in the “Non-equity incentive plan compensation” column (for current benefits only after January 1, 2013) in the “Summary compensation table”; and |
• | executives at the Company are subject to mandatory retirement at age 65 unless the Board of Directors asks them to continue working past that age. |
• | the September 30, 2021 measurement date; |
• | the same assumptions as described in Note 13, Pension Plans and Other Post-Retirement Benefits, of the consolidated financial statements in the 2021 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, except retirement at the greater of 60 or the executive’s actual age as noted above was used for the grandfathered benefit and, as required, no income growth assumption nor any forfeiture assumption was used; |
• | for the grandfathered benefit, the greater of: |
– | years of service, multiplied by the sum of 1.7% of Social Security covered compensation (a 35-year average of Social Security maximum wage bases) plus 2.0% of the highest average normal compensation during a 36-month period in the 10 years prior to the measurement date in excess of Social Security covered compensation; and | |
– | the highest average normal compensation during a 36-month period in the 10 years prior to the measurement date, multiplied by (i) years of service, and (ii) the benefit factor of 2.1%, less the executive’s estimated Social Security benefit multiplied by 1.25% for each year of service up to a maximum of 40 years. |
• | the assumption of a 90% probability that the participant elects a lump-sum equivalent of the monthly annuity amount described above. |
Name | Plan name | Number of years of credited service |
(1) | Present value of accumulated benefit | Payments during last year |
|||||||||
Sitherwood | Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan | – | $ | 299,500 | $ – | |||||||||
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plans | – | 1,339,946 | – | |||||||||||
Rasche | Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan | – | 354,855 | – | ||||||||||
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plans | – | 326,660 | – | |||||||||||
Lindsey | Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan | – | 241,863 | – | ||||||||||
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plans | – | 345,229 | – | |||||||||||
Darrell | Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan | 4.67 | 859,053 | – | ||||||||||
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plans | 4.67 | 559,268 | – | |||||||||||
Geiselhart | Spire Missouri Employees’ Retirement Plan | 2.33 | 636,500 | – | ||||||||||
Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plans | 2.33 | 340,201 | – |
The Spire Deferred Income Plan (“Deferred Income Plan”) covers participant deferrals made on and after January 1, 2005 and is intended to comply with Code Section 409A.
Effective January 1, 2015, the Deferred Income Plan allowed participants, including the NEOs, to defer up to 50% of annual salary, and up to 90% of AIP compensation. Prior to 2015, participants could defer up to 15% of annual salary. For plan years beginning on and after January 1, 2020, participants, including the NEOs, may defer up to 80% of annual salary.
Effective January 1, 2019, the Deferred Income Plan was amended to permit the deferral of up to 100% of equity compensation. In fiscal year 2019, participants could elect to defer PCSUs granted on December 1, 2017 and November 14, 2018. Beginning in fiscal year 2020, participants may elect to defer current grants of PCSUs and TBRSs. Any deferred equity will be distributed in cash, rather than shares.
Effective January 1, 2016, the Deferred Income Plan provides participant investment options that mirror returns in certain 401(k) plan investment funds and Company stock. Effective January 1, 2021, Participants were offered an increased menu of diversified investment options. Participants may also elect an annual fixed interest rate based on Moody’s Corporate Bond Rate not to exceed 120% of the Applicable Federal Rate.
Deferrals of equity grants cannot be diversified into other investments for six months after the grants vest. Dividends paid on deferred equity are invested in any fund instructed by the participant other than the Company Stock Fund.
The Deferred Income Plan provides retirement benefits payable in annual installments over a 15-year period based on the deferred account balance as of the date of retirement. Effective January 1, 2018, participants can elect for new deferrals to be distributed in a lump sum or in installments over two to 15 years.
In the event of any other termination of employment prior to age 55, the executive will receive the deferred account balance reduced by any additional interest credits payable in a lump sum.
For participant deferrals made in or after calendar year 2016, the disability and change in control termination benefits are equal to the deferred account balance at the date of disability or termination.
For participant deferrals made in or after calendar year 2016, the death benefits are equal to the deferred account balance plus participant deferrals projected from the date of death to the end of the plan year in which death occurred.
For participant deferrals made prior to calendar year 2016, the disability deferred account balance is credited with investment income through the end of the plan year in which disability occurs.
The benefits payable for participant deferrals prior to calendar year 2016 upon death, disability and change in control termination are equal to the greater of:
The Laclede Gas Company Deferred Income Plan II (“Deferred Income Plan II”) covers participant deferrals prior to January 1, 2005.
The Deferred Income Plan II provides similar benefits as the Deferred Income Plan with the following exceptions:
The amounts in the table below include contributions by the executive and investment earnings under both deferred compensation plans.
Name | Executive contributions in last FY | (1) | Company contributions in last FY | Aggregate earnings in last FY | (2) | Aggregate withdrawals/ distributions | Aggregate balance at last FYE | |||||||||||||||
Sitherwood | Deferred Income Plan | $ | 803,910 | $ | – | $ | 746,033 | $ | – | $ | 5,182,186 | |||||||||||
Rasche | Deferred Income Plan | 532,711 | – | 166,795 | – | 1,956,716 | ||||||||||||||||
Lindsey | Deferred Income Plan | 83,974 | – | 35,846 | – | 238,924 | ||||||||||||||||
Darrell | Deferred Income Plans | 178,428 | – | 92,823 | – | 822,451 | ||||||||||||||||
Geiselhart | Deferred Income Plan | 343,267 | – | 324,095 | – | 2,226,114 |
(1) | Amounts in this column include vested deferred PCSUs for Ms. Sitherwood and Messrs. Lindsey, Darrell and Geiselhart; amounts included in the “Salary” column of the “Summary compensation table” of $175,770 for Mr. Rasche and $90,007 for Mr. Geiselhart; and amounts included in the “Non-equity incentive plan compensation” column of the “Summary compensation table” of $143,769 for Mr. Rasche and $83,662 for Mr. Geiselhart. |
(2) | The amounts attributable to above-market interest on non-qualified deferred compensation in the “Change in pension value” and “Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings” column in the “Summary compensation table” and identified in footnote 2 to that table are also included in this column. The aggregate earnings include dividends and dividend equivalents paid on deferred TBRSs and PCSUs, which are described in the “All other compensation” column of the “Summary compensation table.” |
This section describes the potential payments and benefits to which the NEOs would have been entitled upon termination of employment, including termination of employment following a change in control, as if such termination had occurred on the last trading day of our fiscal year (September 30, 2021) using the New York Stock Exchange closing price of $61.18 per share of the Company’s stock on that date. The discussion does not include payments and benefits to the extent they are generally provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees upon termination of employment. The following table sets forth the potential payments to the NEOs upon the termination of their employment with the Company, including a termination of employment following a change in control. The table does not include retirement plan benefits payable to the executives shown in the “Pension benefits table.”
Event | Cash severance | (1) | AIP payment | (2) | Equity grants | (3) | Deferred income plan | (4) | Health benefits | (5) | 280G Cutback or excise tax | (6) | Net total payment | |||||||||
Sitherwood | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary termination | $ | 0 | $ | 925,000 | $ | 2,849,936 | $ | 5,182,185 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 8,957,121 | ||||||||
Retirement | 0 | 925,000 | 2,849,936 | 5,182,185 | 0 | 0 | 8,957,121 | |||||||||||||||
Disability | 0 | 925,000 | 3,718,488 | 5,278,245 | 0 | 0 | 9,921,733 | |||||||||||||||
Death | 0 | 925,000 | 3,718,488 | 5,225,584 | 0 | 0 | 9,869,072 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary termination | 1,850,000 | 925,000 | 2,849,936 | 5,182,185 | 31,326 | 0 | 10,838,447 | |||||||||||||||
Change-in-control | 5,550,000 | 925,000 | 4,408,190 | 5,225,584 | 46,990 | 0 | 16,155,764 | |||||||||||||||
Rasche | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary termination | 0 | 274,200 | 655,971 | 1,956,716 | 0 | 0 | 2,886,887 | |||||||||||||||
Retirement | 0 | 274,200 | 655,971 | 1,956,716 | 0 | 0 | 2,886,887 | |||||||||||||||
Disability | 0 | 274,200 | 855,639 | 1,986,601 | 0 | 0 | 3,116,440 | |||||||||||||||
Death | 0 | 274,200 | 855,639 | 2,006,838 | 0 | 0 | 3,136,677 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary termination | 0 | 274,200 | 655,971 | 1,956,716 | 0 | 0 | 2,886,887 | |||||||||||||||
Change-in-control | 2,810,200 | 274,200 | 1,009,591 | 1,957,623 | 0 | (619,329 | ) | 5,432,285 | ||||||||||||||
Lindsey | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary termination | 0 | 401,250 | 890,171 | 238,095 | 0 | 0 | 1,529,516 | |||||||||||||||
Retirement | 0 | 401,250 | 890,171 | 238,095 | 0 | 0 | 1,529,516 | |||||||||||||||
Disability | 0 | 401,250 | 1,161,487 | 240,753 | 0 | 0 | 1,803,490 | |||||||||||||||
Death | 0 | 401,250 | 1,161,487 | 240,202 | 0 | 0 | 1,802,939 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary termination | 535,000 | 401,250 | 890,171 | 238,095 | 21,706 | 0 | 2,086,222 | |||||||||||||||
Change-in-control | 1,872,500 | 401,250 | 1,387,565 | 240,202 | 43,412 | 0 | 3,944,929 | |||||||||||||||
Darrell | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary termination | 0 | 206,000 | 523,169 | 822,451 | 0 | 0 | 1,551,620 | |||||||||||||||
Retirement | 0 | 206,000 | 523,169 | 822,451 | 0 | 0 | 1,551,620 | |||||||||||||||
Disability | 0 | 206,000 | 682,135 | 835,283 | 0 | 0 | 1,723,418 | |||||||||||||||
Death | 0 | 206,000 | 682,135 | 825,845 | 0 | 0 | 1,713,980 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary termination | 0 | 206,000 | 523,169 | 822,451 | 0 | 0 | 1,551,620 | |||||||||||||||
Change-in-control | 1,936,857 | 206,000 | 802,150 | 825,845 | 0 | 0 | 3,770,852 | |||||||||||||||
Geiselhart | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Voluntary termination | 0 | 206,000 | 498,637 | 2,226,113 | 0 | 0 | 2,930,750 | |||||||||||||||
Retirement | 0 | 206,000 | 498,637 | 2,226,113 | 0 | 0 | 2,930,750 | |||||||||||||||
Disability | 0 | 206,000 | 650,058 | 2,276,367 | 0 | 0 | 3,132,425 | |||||||||||||||
Death | 0 | 206,000 | 650,058 | 2,265,028 | 0 | 0 | 3,121,086 | |||||||||||||||
Involuntary termination | 0 | 206,000 | 498,637 | 2,226,113 | 0 | 0 | 2,930,750 | |||||||||||||||
Change-in-control | 1,287,299 | 206,000 | 764,770 | 2,240,625 | 0 | 0 | 4,498,694 |
(1) | Ms. Sitherwood and Mr. Lindsey are participants in the Executive Severance Plan, which provides for a cash payment in the event of an involuntary termination, whether by the Company without cause, or by the executive for good reason, the amount of which is increased if such involuntary termination occurs within 24 months after a change in control. In the event of involuntary termination, Ms. Sitherwood’s cash payment would be based on a multiple of two times annual base salary. Mr. Lindsey’s cash payment would be based on a multiple of one times annual base salary. In the event of involuntary termination within two years following a change in control, Ms. Sitherwood’s cash payment would be based on a multiple of three times annual base salary plus target AIP. Mr. Lindsey’s cash payment would be based on a multiple of two times annual base salary plus target AIP. |
Messrs. Rasche, Darrell and Geiselhart are covered by the Management Continuity Protection Plan (“MCPP”). The potential payments to these officers are limited to termination within 54 months for Mr. Rasche and 42 months for Mr. Darrell and Mr. Geiselhart after a change in control. This cash payment for Mr. Rasche is equal to 2.99 times average annual W-2 compensation, and this cash payment for Mr. Darrell and Mr. Geiselhart is equal to 2.0 times average annual W-2 compensation. | |
(2) | Upon a change in control, any awards under the AIP are deemed earned at a prorated target based on the number of completed days in the fiscal year prior to the change in control. This payment takes place whether or not a termination occurs. The AIP’s definition of change in control mirrors the definition in the Executive Severance Plan. |
If a participant’s employment ceases due to termination without cause or by death, disability or retirement, the participant is eligible to earn a prorated award based upon Company performance and the participant’s achievement of individual metrics. | |
(3) | Participants, including the NEOs, have outstanding PCSUs and TBRSs under the EIP. The EIP uses the same definition of change in control that is used in the AIP and the Executive Severance Plan. |
PCSUs. These awards generally provide for vesting of stock units on the third anniversary of the grant date that falls after the end of the performance period, to the extent that the Committee determines and certifies that the performance criteria have been met or exceeded. A participant forfeits all non-vested awards upon the participant’s termination of employment for cause. | |
If during the performance period a participant dies or leaves the Company due to retirement or disability, the participant remains eligible to earn a prorated award based on the number of full months as a participant during the performance period, as the Committee may determine, if the performance contingency is satisfied. | |
In the event of a change in control, any outstanding awards shall be deemed earned and vested at a prorated target, based on the number of months completed in the performance period at the time of the change in control, if the award is not assumed or replaced with a comparable award by the successor or surviving entity. If the successor or surviving entity does not assume or replace the award, the award will trigger a benefit at a prorated target based on the number of full months as a participant if the participant is involuntarily terminated without cause within two years of the change in control. Dividend equivalents on PCSUs are accrued throughout the performance period and paid to the participant in proportion to the amount of shares actually earned at vesting, up to the amount of dividends that would have been paid on the target number of shares. In the event of a change in control, accrued dividend equivalents would be paid on the same prorated basis as mentioned above. The same amounts would be payable in the event of a participant’s death, retirement or termination of employment due to disability if the target level of performance is achieved. As a result of being retirement-eligible at the time of any termination, PCSU grants would vest on a pro-rata basis for the following individuals, at a value of: |
TBRSs. These shares generally provide for vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date. A participant forfeits all non-vested shares upon the participant’s termination of employment for any reason prior to vesting, other than as a result of a change in control or mandatory retirement requirements. None of the NEOs were subject to mandatory retirement requirements during fiscal year 2021. | |
If a participant’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause within two years following a change in control, the shares become vested on the earlier of the vesting date or the date of the change in control. If a participant’s employment is terminated due to mandatory retirement requirements, the shares become vested based on the number of full months from the award date to the participant’s retirement. | |
(4) | Under the terms of the deferred income plans, if a participant’s employment is terminated within two years of a change in control, the participant will receive a lump-sum payment equal to the greater of (i) the present value of the account balance projected through age 65 using a guaranteed minimum rate of return, or (ii) the actual account balance accumulated through the termination date. However, for deferrals made on and after January 1, 2015, the lump-sum payment would be equal to the participant’s account balance plus the present value of employer contributions and earnings credits that would have been made or earned on such account balance through age 65. |
Upon retirement, the participant will receive the participant’s account balance in 15 installments unless the participant elected a lump sum for deferrals made on and after January 1, 2005, or elected a lump sum or different number of installments for deferrals on or after January 1, 2018. In the event of death or disability, a participant or the participant’s beneficiary will receive the participant’s account balance plus the projected earnings that would have been payable if the participant had retired at age 65. | |
Upon any other termination of employment, the participant will receive all deferred amounts plus interest accrued at the Moody’s rate applicable to each plan year. | |
The amounts reflected in this table are the amounts that each executive would receive if the executive terminated on September 30, 2021. The account balance as of the end of fiscal year 2021 is reflected in the “Non-qualified deferred compensation table” above. | |
(5) | The Executive Severance Plan provides that the Company will provide a cash payment equal to a certain number of months of continued medical, dental and vision coverage. In the event of involuntary termination, absent a change in control, Ms. Sitherwood would receive a cash payment equal to 24 months of continued medical, dental and vision benefits, and Mr. Lindsey would receive a cash payment equal to 12 months of continued medical, dental and vision benefits. In the event of involuntary termination within two years following a change in control, Ms. Sitherwood would receive a cash payment equal to 36 months of continued medical, dental and vision benefits, and Mr. Lindsey would receive a cash payment equal to 24 months of continued medical, dental and vision benefits. The table reflects these cash payments under the “Health benefits” column. The MCPP, which governs the severance arrangements for Messrs. Rasche, Darrell and Geiselhart, does not provide for Company-paid health benefits or any cash equivalent upon termination. |
(6) | Code Section 280G provides guidelines that govern payments triggered by a change in control, known as “parachute payments.” If such payments exceed three times the five-year average annual compensation for certain individuals, the payments may trigger adverse tax consequences and excise taxes. The Company does not provide any gross-up payments for such adverse tax consequences or excise taxes under any of the arrangements.The Executive Severance Plan provides for a “best of net” calculation whereby the reduction in the severance calculation is determined to be the better of a reduction of the calculated amount to the amount permissible under Code Section 280G or the cost to the executive of paying the 20% excise tax on the calculated severance payment. Based on the exemption under Code Section 280G for severance pay that is tied to a non-competition agreement, we believe that Ms. Sitherwood’s severance payment and other change in control benefits would not exceed the limits under Code Section 280G. We also believe that Mr. Lindsey’s severance payment and other change in control benefits would not exceed the limits under Code Section 280G. |
The MCPP provides for the reduction of the calculated severance value to the amount permissible under Code Section 280G. This amount represents the amount the severance payment to Mr. Rasche would be reduced. We believe that no reduction would be required for Mr. Darrell or Mr. Geiselhart. |
CEO pay ratio
Under Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are required to provide the ratio of the annual total compensation of Ms. Sitherwood, president and chief executive officer, to the annual total compensation of the median employee of the Company.
For fiscal year 2021, the annual total compensation of the median employee of the Company and its subsidiaries (other than the president and chief executive officer) was $115,588. Ms. Sitherwood’s total annual compensation for fiscal year 2021 was $5,568,741. Based on this information, the ratio of the compensation of the chief executive officer to the annual total compensation of the median employee was estimated to be 48 to 1.
To identify the median employee, and to determine the total annual compensation of such employee, we used the following methodology. We identified our median employee as of the end of the fiscal year, September 30, 2021, based on our entire workforce of 3,710 employees, using base pay, plus annual and long-term incentive compensation, for the period of October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. Once the median employee was identified, we then determined the median employee’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 2021 using the Summary Compensation Table methodology set out in Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. With respect to the annual total compensation of Ms. Sitherwood, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of the “Summary compensation table.”
Proposal 3: Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accountant
The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of its audit committee, recommends that you ratify the appointment of Deloitte as independent registered public accountant, to audit the books, records and accounts of Spire Inc. and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022. A representative of Deloitte will be present at the annual meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit committee report
The audit committee of the Board of Directors is composed of four directors who are independent as required by and in compliance with the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the rules of the SEC. The names of the committee members as of the date of this proxy statement appear at the end of this report. The committee operates under a written charter.
The primary function of the audit committee is oversight. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements. Management is also responsible for maintaining appropriate accounting and financial reporting practices and policies; for establishing internal controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company is in compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations; and for assessing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for planning and performing an independent audit of the financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and to issue reports expressing an opinion, based on its audit (i) as to the conformity of the audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and (ii) on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the 2021 10-K with management and Deloitte, which included a discussion of the critical accounting policies and practices used by the Company. The committee also discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed under the applicable PCAOB standards.
Deloitte has provided the committee with the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the committee has discussed with Deloitte its independence.
Fees of independent registered public accountant
The following table displays the aggregate fees for professional audit services for the audit of the financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, and fees incurred for other services performed during those periods by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte.
(1) | Audit-related fees consisted of comfort letters, consents for registration statements, work paper reviews and audit consulting. |
(2) | Tax fees consisted primarily of assistance with tax planning, compliance and reporting. |
(3) | All other fees consisted of an annual subscription for the accounting technical library. |
Audit fees for fiscal year 2021 were lower than 2020 as the result of lower fees attributable to audits of Spire STL Pipeline. Audit-related fees were lower than 2020 as the result of lower fees associated with capital market activity. The audit committee pre-approved all of the fees for fiscal years 2021 and 2020. The Policy Regarding the Approval of Independent Registered Public Accountant Provision of Audit and Non-Audit Services is described earlier in this proxy statement.
About the annual shareholders’ meeting
This proxy statement is furnished to solicit proxies by the Board of Directors of Spire for use at the annual meeting of its shareholders to be held at 8:30 a.m., Central Standard Time, on January 27, 2022, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The meeting will be held via live webcast through the link set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders included in this proxy statement. To attend and vote, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. This proxy statement is first being made available to shareholders with the annual report for its fiscal year 2021 on or about December 15, 2021. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 700 Market Street, St. Louis, MO 63101.
Questions and answers about the annual meeting
The Board of Directors of Spire is soliciting your vote for the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.
The annual meeting will be held at 8:30 a.m., Central Standard Time, on January 27, 2022. The meeting will be held virtually through the link set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders included in this proxy statement.
If you owned Spire common stock at the close of business on November 30, 2021, you may attend and vote at the annual meeting.
Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of proxy materials instead of a paper copy of proxy materials?
Under the “Notice and Access” rules of the SEC, we are permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and the 2021 10-K, to our shareholders, by providing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”). Most shareholders will not receive printed copies unless they request them. The Notice instructs you as to how you may access proxy materials on the internet and how you may submit your proxy via the internet. If you would like to receive a paper or electronic copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. Any request to receive proxy materials by mail or electronically will remain in effect until you revoke it.
If more than one shareholder lives in my household and I have elected to receive printed copies of the proxy materials, how can I obtain an extra copy of the proxy materials?
For those shareholders who have elected to receive printed copies of our proxy materials, under the rules of the SEC, we are permitted to deliver a single copy of this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K to multiple shareholders that share the same address, unless we have received contrary instructions from any such shareholder. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. Upon written or oral request, we will mail a separate copy of this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K to any shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of each document was delivered. You may call, toll free, 866-540-7095, or write to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 to request a separate copy.
No, the Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the annual meeting; you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to: (i) vote by internet, (ii) vote by telephone and (iii) request and return a paper proxy card or voting instruction card.
If you previously elected to access proxy materials over the internet, you will not receive a Notice in the mail. You should have received an email with links to the proxy materials and online proxy voting. Also, if you previously requested paper copies of the proxy materials or if applicable regulations required delivery of the proxy materials, you will not receive the Notice.
If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials or the Notice by mail, you can eliminate paper mailings in the future by electing to receive an email that will provide internet links to these documents. Opting to receive future proxy materials online will save us the cost of producing and mailing documents and help us conserve natural resources. Enrollment for electronic delivery is effective until canceled.
You are a shareholder of record if your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare. You will receive a Notice or these proxy materials by delivery directly to you. You are entitled to vote your shares by internet, telephone, at the virtual meeting, or, if you have requested printed proxy materials, by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card.
You are a beneficial owner if you hold your stock in a stock brokerage account, or through a bank or other nominee. Your shares are held in “street name” and the Notice or these proxy materials are being sent to you by your broker, bank or nominee, who is considered the shareholder of record. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote. You may attend the annual meeting virtually, but you will need to provide a letter or statement from that firm that shows you were a beneficial owner of Spire shares on November 30, 2021. You may not vote these shares virtually at the annual meeting unless you request, complete and deliver a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee. If you requested printed proxy materials, your broker, bank or nominee provided a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares.
A majority of our issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting as of the record date must be virtually present or represented by proxy to have a quorum. As of November 30, 2021, there were 51,741,939 shares outstanding. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining quorum.
The election of directors requires the affirmative vote FOR each nominee of a majority of those shares entitled to vote and virtually present at the meeting or represented by proxy. Withheld votes and abstentions will have the effect of votes against the nominee, while broker non-votes will not be considered represented and will have no effect on the outcome.
This proposal, which is non-binding, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote and virtually present or represented by proxy at the meeting to be approved. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the proposal, while broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome.
Voting matters
You may vote on the internet, by telephone, by mail or by virtually attending the annual meeting through the link set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders included in this proxy statement and voting by ballot. The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate that you are a shareholder by use of a control number. The procedures allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone or internet, you do not need to mail back your proxy card or voting instruction card.
If you have internet access, you may submit your proxy by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you requested printed proxy materials, by following the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card. On the internet voting site, you can confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote on the internet, you can also request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.
You can vote by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you requested printed proxy materials, by following the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card.
If you elected to receive printed proxy materials by mail, you may choose to vote by mail by marking your proxy card or voting instruction card, dating and signing it, and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided. Please allow sufficient time for mailing if you decide to vote by mail.
This year’s annual meeting will be held entirely online to allow for greater participation. Shareholders may participate in the annual meeting by visiting the following website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SR2021. To participate in the annual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included in your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. Shares held in your name as the shareholder of record may be voted electronically during the annual meeting by following the instructions on the screen. However, if your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or the nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at the annual meeting. You should allow yourself enough time prior to the annual meeting to obtain this proxy from the holder of record.
The shares voted electronically, by telephone or represented by proxy cards received, properly marked, dated, signed and not revoked, will be voted at the annual meeting.
If you hold your shares through a broker, please note that your broker will not be permitted to vote on your behalf for the first two proposals unless you provide instructions as to how to vote your shares. Voting your shares is important to ensure that you are represented at the meeting. If you have any questions about the voting process, please contact the broker where you hold your shares.
Can I vote my shares that are held in the Company’s dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan or any of the Company’s 401(k) plans?
If you participate in the Company’s dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan or in the Company Stock Fund of the Spire Employee Savings Plan, you are entitled to vote those shares. If you do not give voting instructions for shares owned by you through this plan, none of your shares held in the plan will be voted. To allow sufficient time for voting by the administrator and trustee of the plan, your voting instructions must be received by January 24, 2022.
• | Sending timely written notice of revocation to the corporate secretary; |
• | Submitting another timely proxy by telephone, internet or proxy card; or |
• | Attending the annual meeting and voting your shares. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor from the holder of record to be able to vote at the meeting. |
If you are a shareholder of record and you either indicate that you want to vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or you return a signed proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote, then your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors on all matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting. If you indicate a choice for any matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
If you hold shares in street name and do not provide instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes” on certain proposals. Generally, broker non-votes occur on a non-routine proposal where a broker is not permitted to vote on that proposal without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given. Broker non-votes are considered present at the annual meeting, but not as voting on a matter. Thus, broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, but are not counted for purposes of determining whether a matter has been approved. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the votes on the first two proposals. If you do not provide instructions to your broker, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, your broker will not be authorized to vote the shares it holds for you with respect to the first two proposals. Your broker has the discretion, however, to vote the shares it holds for you on the ratification of the independent registered public accountant.
We hired Broadridge Financial Solutions as an independent tabulator of votes to ensure confidentiality of the voting process. However, if you write comments on your proxy card, the comments will be shared with us. We also have hired Broadridge Financial Solutions to serve as independent inspector of elections.
Requirements for submission of proxy proposals, nomination of directors and other business
Under the rules of the SEC, shareholder proposals intended to be included in the proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders in January 2023 must be received by the corporate secretary of Spire Inc. at its principal office at the address set forth on page 24 of this proxy statement by August 11, 2022.
Also, the procedures to be used by shareholders to recommend nominees to the corporate governance committee are outlined on page 24 of this proxy statement. If a shareholder seeks to nominate a person or make a shareholder proposal from the floor of the annual meeting in January 2023, notice must be received by the corporate secretary at the Company’s principal business offices no later than October 28, 2022 and not before September 28, 2022 (not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days, respectively, prior to January 27, 2023). Also, such proposal must be, under law, an appropriate subject for shareholder action to be brought before the meeting.
Proxy solicitation
We will pay the expense of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by officers or employees by email, telephone, fax or special letter. We have hired Morrow Sodali LLC, 333 Ludlow Street, 5th Floor, South Tower, Stamford, CT 06902, to assist us in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $7,500, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses for those services.
Board of Directors | ||
Spire Board | https://www.spireenergy.com/officers-directors | |
Board committee charters | ||
Audit committee | http://investors.spireenergy.com/governance/governance-documents | |
Compensation and human resources committee | http://investors.spireenergy.com/governance/governance-documents | |
Corporate governance committee | http://investors.spireenergy.com/governance/governance-documents | |
Financial reporting | ||
Annual Report | http://investors.spireenergy.com/filings-and-reports/annual-reports | |
Governance documents | ||
Code of Business Conduct | http://investors.spireenergy.com/governance/governance-documents | |
Corporate Governance Guidelines | http://investors.spireenergy.com/governance/governance-documents |